NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2024

Uva Ursi

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Uva Ursi is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 21 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 11 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 2,692 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 21 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 11 RCTs (8 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 2,692
Reported Trial Dosages 105 mg · 3 g · 1 g/day
Trial Duration Range 5 days · 30 days · 7 days
Reading Time ~11 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 21 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (105 mg · 3 g · 1 g/day) over a structured 5 days evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary botanicals clinical efficacy (21 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (12 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (11 RCTs · 8 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (1 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Uva Ursi & Why Does Form Matter?

Uva Ursi is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 21 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (105 mg, 3 g, 1 g/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Uva Ursi frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (11 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Uva Ursi acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Uva Ursi an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 21 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 11 randomized controlled trials (8 double-blind, n = 2,692 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:34111592 (2021) — "Herbal treatment with uva ursi extract versus fosfomycin in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomized controlled trial." (DISCUSSION: In women with uncomplicated UTIs, initial treatment with UU reduced antibiotic use but led to a higher symptom burden and more safety concerns than fosfomycin.) • PMID:30075316 (2018) — "Identification and characterization of in vitro inhibitors against UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 in uva-ursi extracts and evaluation of in vivo uva-ursi-drug interactions." (These findings will be helpful for the safe and effective use of uva-ursi extracts in clinical practice.) • PMID:25376340 (2014) — "Internet claims on dietary and herbal supplements in advanced nephropathy: truth or myth." (CONCLUSIONS: Nephrologists need to be cognizant of the lack of substantiated proven benefits of these substances and of the potential adverse effects in the animal models that can translate to the patients.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 105 mg · 3 g · 1 g/day · 2 mg over 5 days · 30 days · 7 days · 90 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Uva Ursi, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (105 mg · 3 g · 1 g/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 5 days.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (21 Studies) · 12 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Clinical microbiology and infection (2021) PMID: 34111592 ↗
Herbal treatment with uva ursi extract versus fosfomycin in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical microbiology and infection involving n = 207 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (MD 2.8). Key conclusion: DISCUSSION: In women with uncomplicated UTIs, initial treatment with UU reduced antibiotic use but led to a higher symptom burden and more safety concerns than fosfomycin.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: We explored whether initial treatment with the herbal drug uva ursi (UU) reduces antibiotic use in women with uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) without increasing symptom burden and complication frequency compared with antibiotic treatment. METHODS: A double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 42 family practices in Germany. The participants were adult women with suspected uncomplicated UTIs receiving either UU 105 mg 3 × 2 tablets for 5 days (intervention) or fosfomycin a 3-g single dose (control), and their respective placebos. Participants and investigators were blinded. The primary outcome included (1) antibiotic courses day 0-28 as superiority, and (2) symptom burden (sum of daily symptom scores) day 0-7, as non-inferiority outcome (margin 125%). Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03151603. RESULTS: Overall, 398 patients were randomly allocated to groups receiving UU (n = 207) and fosfomycin (n = 191). The number of antibiotic courses was 63.6% lower (95% CI 53.6%-71.4%; p < 0.0001) in the UU group than in the fosfomycin group. The ratio of total symptom burden in the UU group compared with control was 136.5% (95% CI 122.7-151.9; p 0.95), failing non-inferiority. Eight women developed pyelonephritis in the UU group compared with two in the fosfomycin group (mean difference 2.8; 95% CI 0.2-5.9; p 0.067). Adverse events were similar between the groups. DISCUSSION: In women with uncomplicated UTIs, initial treatment with UU reduced antibiotic use but led to a higher symptom burden and more safety concerns than fosfomycin.

02
CLINICAL STUDY Food and chemical toxicology (2018) PMID: 30075316 ↗
Identification and characterization of in vitro inhibitors against UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 in uva-ursi extracts and evaluation of in vivo uva-ursi-drug interactions.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Clinical Study published in Food and chemical toxicology. Key conclusion: These findings will be helpful for the safe and effective use of uva-ursi extracts in clinical practice.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Uva-ursi leaf is widely used to treat symptoms of lower urinary tract infections. Here, we evaluated the in vitro inhibitory effects of uva-ursi extracts on 10 major human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) isoforms. Of the 10 tested UGT isoforms, uva-ursi extracts exerted the strongest inhibitory effect on UGT1A1-mediated β-estradiol 3-glucuronidation with the lowest IC50 value of 8.45 ± 1.56 μg/mL. To identify the components of uva-ursi extracts showing strong inhibitory effects against UGT1A1, the inhibitory effects of nine major constituents of the extracts were assessed. Among the tested compounds, gallotannin exerted the most potent inhibition on UGT1A1, followed by 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose; both demonstrated competitive inhibition, with Ki values of 1.68 ± 0.150 μM and 3.55 ± 0.418 μM. We found that gallotannin and 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose also inhibited another UGT1A1-specific biotransformation, SN-38-glucuronidation, showing the same order of inhibition. Thus, in vitro UGT1A1 inhibitory potentials of uva-ursi extracts might primarily result from the inhibitory activities of gallotannin and 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose present in the extracts. However, in rats, co-administration with uva-ursi extracts did not alter the in vivo marker for UGT1A1 activity, expressed as the molar ratio of AUCSN-38 glucuronide/AUCSN-38, because plasma concentrations of gallotannin and 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose may be too low to inhibit the UGT1A1-mediated metabolism of SN-38 in vivo. The poor oral absorption of gallotannin and 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose in uva-ursi extracts might cause the poor in vitro-in vivo correlation. These findings will be helpful for the safe and effective use of uva-ursi extracts in clinical practice.

03
CLINICAL STUDY American journal of nephrology (2014) PMID: 25376340 ↗
Internet claims on dietary and herbal supplements in advanced nephropathy: truth or myth.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Clinical Study published in American journal of nephrology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Nephrologists need to be cognizant of the lack of substantiated proven benefits of these substances and of the potential adverse effects in the animal models that can translate to the patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The use of complementary/alternative medicine has garnered rising interest in recent years. Natural products including herbs, vitamins, and minerals are the most popularly consumed. The Internet is a ubiquitous source of information/market for these supplements. AIM: To systematically evaluate the dietary and herbal supplement recommended for patients with CKD and ESRD on the Internet, and try to distinguish between the claim of the manufacturer and proven scientific data. METHODS: A questionnaire assessing each website was formulated. Each product ingredient was recorded in the questionnaire by two independent reviewers and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 184 websites, 28% claimed to decrease CKD progression, 60% did not advise to consult a doctor before taking the supplement, and >90% did not mention any potential drug interaction, disease interaction, or caution in use during pregnancy or in children. The ten common plant ingredients claiming to be beneficial in kidney diseases were uva ursi, dandelion, parsley, corn silk, juniper, celery, buchu, horsetail, marshmallow, and stinging nettle. In contrast to their claims, these substances were not adequately studied in humans. The available animal studies showed detrimental effects and potential drug interactions with commonly used medications in the CKD/ESRD population. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrologists need to be cognizant of the lack of substantiated proven benefits of these substances and of the potential adverse effects in the animal models that can translate to the patients. Most importantly, the policy needs to change regarding the regulation of these products to prevent patient harm and misinformation. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Microbiological research (2014) PMID: 23916388 ↗
Medicinal plant extracts variously modulate susceptibility of Escherichia coli to different antibiotics.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2014 Clinical Study published in Microbiological research. Key conclusion: Mechanism of modulating action of extracts on bacterial antibiotic susceptibility probably involves antioxidant, preferentially iron-chelating, or prooxidant properties of polyphenols.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Antioxidant activity of green and black tea and extracts of medicinal plants and their ability to modulate antibiotic susceptibility in Escherichia coli were studied. Among a number of extracts tested the maximal capacity to scavenge DPPH radicals and chelate iron in chemical tests was found in green and black tea, Arctostaphylos uva-ursi and Vaccinium vitis-idaea. These extracts contained high level of polyphenols and in aerobic conditions exhibited prooxidant features, producing H2O2 and inducing expression of the katG gene encoding catalase HPI in E. coli cells. A good correlation between the polyphenol content and the ability of extracts to protect bacteria against peroxide stress was observed (r = 0.88). Polyphenol-rich extracts and iron chelators demonstrated the highest modulating effect on the antibiotic susceptibility by changing the time period before lysis started and by influencing the colony-forming ability of bacteria. The direction of the modulating effect was dependent on nature of antibiotic applied: under treatment with ciprofloxacin and ampicillin the extracts predominantly provided protective effects, while under treatment with kanamycin a bactericidal action was enhanced. Mechanism of modulating action of extracts on bacterial antibiotic susceptibility probably involves antioxidant, preferentially iron-chelating, or prooxidant properties of polyphenols.

05
CLINICAL STUDY Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy (2001) PMID: 11600378 ↗
Marked potentiation of activity of beta-lactams against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by corilagin.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2001 Clinical Study published in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. Key conclusion: Corilagin reduced the MICs of various beta-lactams by 100- to 2,000-fold but not the MICs of other antimicrobial agents tested.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

We found that an extract of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi markedly reduced the MICs of beta-lactam antibiotics, such as oxacillin and cefmetazole, against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. We isolated the effective compound and identified it as corilagin. Corilagin reduced the MICs of various beta-lactams by 100- to 2,000-fold but not the MICs of other antimicrobial agents tested. The effect of corilagin and oxacillin was synergistic. Corilagin showed a bactericidal action when added to the growth medium in combination with oxacillin.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Yakugaku zasshi (1992) PMID: 1469616 ↗
[Pharmacological studies on leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. V. Effect of water extract from Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (bearberry leaf) on the antiallergic and antiinflammatory activities of dexamethasone ointment].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 1992 Clinical Study published in Yakugaku zasshi. Key conclusion: These results suggest that Bearberry leaf increases the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on the allergic and inflammatory models.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Effects of water extract (UW-ext) from the leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng (Bearberry leaf) on the antiallergic and antiinflammatory activities of dexamethasone ointment were investigated. One or 2% UW-ext ointment did not inhibit the ear swelling by picryl chloride-induced contact dermatitis (PC-CD) and carrageenin-induced paw edema. UW-ext augmented the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone ointment (0.005 or 0.025%) on these allergic and inflammatory models, but not the side effect of it. These results suggest that Bearberry leaf increases the inhibitory effect of dexamethasone on the allergic and inflammatory models.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Yakugaku zasshi (1991) PMID: 1875280 ↗
[Pharmacological studies on leaf of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. III. Combined effect of arbutin and indomethacin on immuno-inflammation].
Clinical Trial Synthesis 1991 Clinical Study published in Yakugaku zasshi. Key conclusion: These results suggest that arbutin may increase the inhibitory action of indomethacin on PC-CD, SRBC-DTH, carrageenin-induced edema and adjuvant-induced arthritis, but further investigations are required to understand the mechanism involved.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

A study was carried out to examine the combined effect of arbutin isolated from the leaves of Arctostaphylos uva-ursi (L.) Spreng. (Bearberry leaf) and indomethacin on Type IV allergic reaction-induced immuno-inflammation, carrageenin-induced edema and adjuvant-induced arthritis. Contact dermatitis caused by picryl chloride (PC-CD) and sheep red cell delayed type hypersensitivity (SRBC-DTH) was not inhibited by the oral application of arbutin at 2 divided doses immediately before and 16 h after the application, but arbutin at dose of 50 mg/kg 24 h after the application rapidly decreased the swelling of PC-CD. Arbutin (p.o.) plus indomethacin (s.c.) showed inhibitory effect on the swelling of PC-CD and SRBC-DTH stronger than that of indomethacin alone. When arbutin (p.o.) and indomethacin (s.c.) in a given portion were simultaneously administered, the inhibitory effect was more potent than that of indomethacin alone in both carrageenin-induced edema and adjuvant-induced arthritis. These results suggest that arbutin may increase the inhibitory action of indomethacin on PC-CD, SRBC-DTH, carrageenin-induced edema and adjuvant-induced arthritis, but further investigations are required to understand the mechanism involved.

08
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2024) PMID: 39698942 ↗
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for treating symptomatic uncomplicated urinary tract infections in non-pregnant adult women.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 1,144 participants (RR 0.67). Key conclusion: OBJECTIVES: This review aims to investigate the benefits and risks associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated UTIs in non-pregnant adult women.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Almost half of all women will have at least one symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) in their lifetime. Although usually self-remitting, 74% of women contacting a health professional are prescribed an antibiotic, and in rare instances, they may progress to more severe infections. Therefore, the standard of care for the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated UTIs is oral antibiotic therapy, which aims to achieve symptom resolution and prevent the development of complications such as pyelonephritis. Given that a number of UTIs are self-remitting, non-antibiotic treatments that may help reduce the severity or duration of symptoms or reduce the need for antibiotics may be of benefit. OBJECTIVES: This review aims to investigate the benefits and risks associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated UTIs in non-pregnant adult women. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 18 November 2024 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs looking at the effectiveness of NSAIDs in the treatment of symptomatic uncomplicated UTIs in non-pregnant adult women. The outcomes of interest were: 1) short-term resolution of symptoms (days 1 to 4); 2) medium-term resolution of symptoms (days 5 to 10); and 3) incidence of adverse events (including progression to sepsis or complicated UTI, hospitalisation or need for intravenous antibiotics, gastrointestinal complications, or death) up to 30 days from randomisation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Screening, abstract selection, and data extraction were carried out independently by two authors, and any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third author. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a ra

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) BMJ open (2022) PMID: 35750460 ↗
Bearberry in the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis (BRUMI): protocol of a multicentre, randomised double-blind clinical trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in BMJ open involving n = 504 participants. Key conclusion: At least 504 patients (allocated as 1:1) will need to be enrolled to access non-inferiority with a non-inferiority limit of 14% for the primary endpoint.Improvement of symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis (based on the ACSS score) at day 7 is defined as the primary endpoint, wherea
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Bearberry (Arctostaphylos uva-ursi) leaf is available as a treatment of uncomplicated cystitis in several European countries. The antimicrobial activity of its extracts and some of its individual constituents has been observed in vitro; however, the efficacy of bearberry compared with standard antimicrobial therapy has not been assessed yet. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the safety and non-inferiority of bearberry as an alternative therapy in the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis in comparison with standard antibiotic therapy (fosfomycin). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled double-blinded multicentre trial. Eligible patients will be premenopausal women with a sum score of ≥6 for the typical acute uncomplicated cystitis symptoms (frequency, urgency, painful urination, incomplete emptying, suprapubic pain and visible haematuria) reported on the Acute Cystitis Symptom Score (ACSS) typical domain and pyuria. Patients will be randomly assigned to receive 3 g single dose of fosfomycin powder and two placebo tablets three times a day for 7 days or B a single dose of placebo powder and two tablets containing a dry extract of Uvae ursi folium. At least 504 patients (allocated as 1:1) will need to be enrolled to access non-inferiority with a non-inferiority limit of 14% for the primary endpoint.Improvement of symptoms of uncomplicated cystitis (based on the ACSS score) at day 7 is defined as the primary endpoint, whereas several secondary endpoints such as the number and ratio of patients with bacteriuria at day 7, frequency and severity of side effects; recurrence of urinary tract infection, concurrent use of other over the counter (OTC) medications and food supplements will be determined to elucidate more detailed differences between the groups. The number of recurrences and medications taken for treatment will be monitored for a follow-up period of 90 days (80-100 days). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (IV/4225-1/2021/EKU). The results will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of diabetes (2016) PMID: 26362826 ↗
Controlling type 2 diabetes mellitus with herbal medicines: A triple-blind randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2016 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of diabetes; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity or lipid profile among the three groups.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The use of alternative medicines is common in patients with diabetes mellitus. The primary aim of the present study was to determine the effects of cinnamon and Caucasian whortleberry (Vaccinium arctostaphylos L.) on blood glucose control, lipid profile and body mass index (BMI) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). METHODS: In all, 105 T2DM patients were recruited to the present randomized triple-blinded clinical trial. Patients were randomly divided into three groups and administered either placebo, cinnamon or whortleberry supplements (1 g/day) for 90 days. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), serum insulin, lipid profiles, and HbA1c were measured before and after the study. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among the three groups. After treatment, FBG, 2-h blood postprandial glucose and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were significantly reduced in patients in the whortleberry group, but not in the placebo group. After treatment, there was a significant difference in BMI between the cinnamon and control groups (P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in any variables between the cinnamon and whortleberry groups (P>0.05 for all). In addition, there was a significant decrease in all indices of glucose control in all the cinnamon and whortleberry groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in blood glucose levels, insulin sensitivity or lipid profile among the three groups. However, the use of cinnamon and whortleberry in addition to conventional medical treatment is recommended to adjust weight and blood glucose levels in patients with T2DM, respectively. © 2015 Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category