NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Vitamin C (1000mg)

IMMUNE · Evidence Monograph

Vitamin C (1000mg) is an evidence-graded immune monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (2 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 687,818 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 2 Meta · 5 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 687,818
Reported Trial Dosages 50,000 IU · 1000 mg/day · 800 IU/day
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 7 days · 8 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (50,000 IU · 1000 mg/day · 800 IU/day) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary immune clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (13 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (2 meta-analyses · 5 reviews)
01

What Is Vitamin C (1000mg) & Why Does Form Matter?

Vitamin C (1000mg) is classified under IMMUNE and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (50,000 IU, 1000 mg/day, 800 IU/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Vitamin C (1000mg) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Vitamin C (1000mg) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Vitamin C (1000mg) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 2 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 687,818 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41980254 (2026) — "Interventions for the Management of Bladder Spasms in Adults with Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A Nursing Practice-Oriented Systematic Review." (CONCLUSION: Nursing-led, non-pharmacological interventions play a central role in managing bladder spasms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters and should be prioritized in clinical practice.) • PMID:41900080 (2026) — "Glutathione in Skin Aging and Tissue Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Redox Modulation, and Biomedical Implications." (Elevated GSH levels enhance cellular resistance to oxidative stress and reduce apoptotic signaling.) • PMID:41869844 (2026) — "Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Children 2026." (CONCLUSIONS: Updated management guidelines were issued by a panel of international experts for the best care of children with sepsis or sept)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)OR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 417405842.42 (2.07–2.83)PMID 420666402.65PMID 420649990.93 (0.88–0.99)0.2Null (1)5Metric: OR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 50,000 IU · 1000 mg/day · 800 IU/day · 2 g over 12 weeks · 7 days · 8 weeks · 4 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Vitamin C (1000mg), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (50,000 IU · 1000 mg/day · 800 IU/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 13 Quantitative Analyses

01
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria (2026) PMID: 41980254 ↗
Interventions for the Management of Bladder Spasms in Adults with Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A Nursing Practice-Oriented Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Nursing-led, non-pharmacological interventions play a central role in managing bladder spasms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters and should be prioritized in clinical practice.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To critically synthesize evidence on pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions relevant to nursing practice for the prevention and management of bladder spasms and catheter-related bladder discomfort in adults with indwelling urinary catheters. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Scopus were searched for English-language studies published from 2015 to 2025. Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and prospective studies involving adult patients with indwelling urinary catheters were included. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions were effective in reducing bladder spasms and catheter-related bladder discomfort. Non-pharmacological, nursing-led interventions-such as catheter balloon volume adjustment, neuromodulatory techniques, evidence-based targeted nursing care, structured nursing management models, and Traditional Chinese Medicine-based nursing approaches-demonstrated consistent reductions in symptom severity and improvements in patient comfort. Pharmacological therapies, including vitamin C, solifenacin, and ketamine, were primarily effective for short-term symptom relief. Overall, four studies were assessed as having low risk of bias, five as moderate risk, and one as high risk. CONCLUSION: Nursing-led, non-pharmacological interventions play a central role in managing bladder spasms in patients with indwelling urinary catheters and should be prioritized in clinical practice. Further high-quality studies with standardized outcome measures are required to strengthen the evidence base. OBJETIVO. Sintetizar de forma crítica la evidencia sobre las intervenciones farmacológicas y no farmacológicas relevantes para la práctica de la enfermería en la prevención y el tratamiento de los espasmos vesicales y las molestias vesicales relacionadas con el catéter en adultos con catéteres urinarios permanentes. MÉTODOS. Se realizó una revisión sistemática de acuerdo con las directrices Preferred

02
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) (2026) PMID: 41900080 ↗
Glutathione in Skin Aging and Tissue Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Molecular Mechanisms, Redox Modulation, and Biomedical Implications.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland). Key conclusion: Elevated GSH levels enhance cellular resistance to oxidative stress and reduce apoptotic signaling.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Glutathione (GSH) is a central regulator of redox homeostasis, melanogenesis, and cellular repair, and has gained increasing attention in dermatology for its potential roles in skin brightening, anti-aging, and tissue regeneration. This systematic review evaluated molecular, clinical, and translational evidence of glutathione's applications and safety across different delivery modalities. The review followed PRISMA guidelines and included studies published between 2000 and 2025. A total of 194 studies met the inclusion criteria, evaluating the effectiveness of glutathione in esthetic dermatology and regenerative medicine. Topical and oral glutathione demonstrated favorable effects on pigmentation, skin brightness, hydration, and oxidative stress markers. Injectable glutathione increases systemic levels rapidly, but is associated with short-lasting effects and potential safety concerns. Glutathione S-transferases facilitate the conjugation of glutathione to electrophilic xenobiotics, thereby protecting proteins and nucleic acids from electrophile-induced damage. Glutathione Peroxidase employs GSH as an electron donor to reduce hydrogen peroxide and lipid hydroperoxides, thus protecting membrane lipids, mitochondrial membranes, and DNA from oxidative damage. Glutathione facilitates the regeneration of other antioxidants, such as vitamin C and vitamin E, through redox cycling. A consistent correlation exists between reduced GSH levels and neuronal dysfunction. Elevated GSH levels enhance cellular resistance to oxidative stress and reduce apoptotic signaling. GSH plays a pivotal role in cutaneous aging and tissue repair through redox regulation, mitochondrial protection, and the modulation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix pathways. To elucidate the clinical significance of glutathione, future research should focus on conducting randomized controlled trials, developing standardized formulations, and performing long-term safety assessments.

03
CLINICAL STUDY Pediatric critical care medicine (2026) PMID: 41869844 ↗
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock in Children 2026.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Pediatric critical care medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Updated management guidelines were issued by a panel of international experts for the best care of children with sepsis or sept
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVES: To update evidence-based management recommendations for clinicians caring for children (including infants, school-aged children, and adolescents) with sepsis or septic shock. DESIGN: A panel of 68 international experts, representing 13 international organizations, as well as six methodologists, was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and applied throughout. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the chairs, co-chairs, methodologists, and subgroup leads as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development process. METHODS: New priority topics and recommendations from the prior guideline iteration were used to identify Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) questions likely to have new or updated evidence. We conducted a systematic review to identify the best available evidence, summarized the evidence, and then assessed the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence-to-decision framework to formulate recommendations as strong or conditional, or as a good practice statement. "In our practice," statements were included when evidence was inconclusive to issue a recommendation but the panel felt that some guidance based on practice patterns may be appropriate. RESULTS: The panel provided 61 statements on the management of children with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, five were strong recommendations, 24 were conditional recommendations, and ten were good practice statements. For 22 PICO questions, no recommendations could be made, but, for seven of these, "in our practice" statements were provided. Compared with the 2020 guidelines, 20 recommendations were new, 13 were updated for clarity and/or new evidence, six were reviewed but not changed, and 22 were carried forward based on consensus of the panel that new evidence was not available. Only three recommendations were based on high or moderate certainty of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Updated management guidelines were issued by a panel of international experts for the best care of children with sepsis or sept

04
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2026) PMID: 41829943 ↗
Is the Juice Worth the Squeeze? Vitamin C Supplementation in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: Conclusions: Evidence on vitamin C supplementation for functional iron deficiency and RLS suggests that it might be an effective therapeutic approach.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background: Patients undergoing hemodialysis commonly exhibit deficiencies in water-soluble vitamins, primarily as a result of inadequate dietary intake and loss into the dialysate. Given the essential role of vitamin C in numerous metabolic pathways, routine supplementation has been proposed as a potentially beneficial intervention in this population. Aim: We aimed to evaluate the current evidence on vitamin C supplementation in patients undergoing hemodialysis, with particular attention to clinical conditions associated with renal replacement therapy, including anemia, chronic inflammation, restless legs syndrome (RLS), and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The MEDLINE (via PubMed) and EMBASE databases were searched. The initial search yielded 844 articles, of which 37 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. Results: Evidence indicates that hemodialysis patients exhibit vitamin C deficiency, both in dietary intake and in plasma or serum concentrations. Despite its intrinsic antioxidant properties and proposed anti-inflammatory effects, vitamin C supplementation has demonstrated inconsistent effects on inflammatory markers. Most clinical studies support a beneficial role of vitamin C supplementation in functional iron deficiency and in alleviating symptoms of RLS within this population. Conclusions: Evidence on vitamin C supplementation for functional iron deficiency and RLS suggests that it might be an effective therapeutic approach. However, despite low serum vitamin C level in hemodialysis patients, current data does not justify the routine use of vitamin C in the hemodialyzed population for other comorbidities, including chronic inflammation and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Further high-quality studies are required to establish the broader clinical utility of targeted vitamin C supplementation.

05
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of medicine and life (2026) PMID: 41815850 ↗
Clinical benefits and risks of high-dose intravenous vitamin C: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Journal of medicine and life. Key conclusion: Furthermore, interest in home-based infusion services is increasing in several healthcare systems, although clinical outcome data specific to high-dose IVC in these settings remain limited.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

High-dose intravenous vitamin C (IVC) achieves plasma concentrations that are not attainable by oral administration and has been investigated as an adjunct in sepsis, oncology, and symptom management. To synthesize the evidence regarding the clinical benefits and risks of high-dose IVC, as well as the potential advantages of on-site infusion, a PRISMA-informed search of PubMed/PMC, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010-2025) was conducted, prioritizing randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and high-quality observational studies. Pharmacokinetic and mechanistic studies of IVC support plausible physiologic benefits through antioxidant effects, catecholamine biosynthesis, and immune modulation, with recent evidence showing down regulation of pro-inflammatory STAT1/PD-L1 pathways in experimental sepsis. Oncology phase I and II studies demonstrate safety and quality-of-life improvements; a randomized phase II pancreatic trial reported a promising survival benefit when combined with chemotherapy. Some of the major risks include oxalate nephropathy and hemolysis in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, especially with very large or repeated doses, suggesting pre-screening to avoid these risks. Furthermore, the literature on home infusion and IV therapies is limited; however, the expanding home infusion infrastructure offers an avenue for monitored IVC delivery. In conclusion, evidence does not support routine use of high-dose IVC in sepsis, and its role in oncology remains supportive and exploratory, with potential risks requiring caution. Furthermore, interest in home-based infusion services is increasing in several healthcare systems, although clinical outcome data specific to high-dose IVC in these settings remain limited. © 2026 The Author(s).

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Food & function (2026) PMID: 41784995 ↗
The effect of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure in adults: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Food & function. Key conclusion: Although DBP did not decrease overall, a clinically important reduction was observed in patients with diabetes (-2.27 mmHg).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Uncertainty persists regarding the estimated effects of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure, including the strength of the evidence supporting these estimates and the magnitude of the observed effects relative to the minimal important difference. We aimed to provide an overview of the effects of vitamin C supplementation on blood pressure among adults through an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from the earliest date available to 25 December 2024. We identified eligible meta-analyses and included all primary trials, adding any RCTs not included in the largest review. For each trial, we extracted the mean change in blood pressure and its SD for both groups to calculate the mean difference as the effect size. The certainty of evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. We identified six meta-analyses involving a total of 17 RCTs reporting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as outcomes. The findings suggest that vitamin C supplementation may reduce SBP by approximately 3.7 mmHg. Although DBP did not decrease overall, a clinically important reduction was observed in patients with diabetes (-2.27 mmHg). These results indicate that vitamin C supplementation may have a meaningful beneficial effect on blood pressure. Nevertheless, the low certainty of evidence highlights the necessity for larger, long-term randomized trials to definitively confirm its efficacy.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) (2026) PMID: 41759242 ↗
Scurvy, an enduring mimicker and diagnostic dilemma in adults: A review of the 280 relevant published cases in the twenty-first century.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Clinical Study published in Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) involving n = 280 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Despite the varied presentations, early recognition remains crucial for effective management of this misdiagnosed condition mimicking more frequent diseases like autoimmune or haemostatic disorders to prompt rapid and efficacious vitamin C supplementation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Scurvy persists as a significant adult medical condition, frequently overlooked due to its mimicry of more common diseases. This review aims to analyse reported adult cases from the twenty-first century to characterize its current epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic challenges. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted across PubMed and MEDLINE for the period 2000-2025, including case reports, case series, and observational studies on adult scurvy. Non-informative texts and paediatric cases were excluded. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools were utilized to assist in translating non-English articles and to extract preliminary data from plain text. To ensure data integrity, all AI-generated variables were rigorously manually verified against the original full-text articles to correct any potential errors or hallucinations. RESULTS: We identified 280 cases of adult scurvy reported from 2000 to 2025. Predominant clinical features included skin lesions, specifically purpura and corkscrew hairs, alongside anaemia and haemorrhage. Social determinants of health played a critical role; many patients presented with restrictive diets, homelessness, or social isolation-risk factors often overlooked at initial presentation. The clinical picture was frequently obscured by nonspecific symptoms, such as general physical deterioration, rheumatological symptoms or oral manifestations leading to diagnostic delays and extensive, unnecessary investigations for autoimmune or haemostatic disorders. CONCLUSION: Despite the varied presentations, early recognition remains crucial for effective management of this misdiagnosed condition mimicking more frequent diseases like autoimmune or haemostatic disorders to prompt rapid and efficacious vitamin C supplementation. Addressing social determinants of health, including poverty, social isolation, and limited access to nutritious food, is essential for preventing and managing scurvy within vulnerable populations.

08
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2026) PMID: 41687812 ↗
Effect of vitamin C supplementation on post-exercise recovery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind placebo trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 31 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 1 (MD 0). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Based on a very limited number of small randomized trials, vitamin C supplementation does not appear to consistently modify post-exercise inflammatory or oxidative stress biomarkers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Exercise-induced oxidative stress and inflammation may impair recovery and performance. Vitamin C, a potent antioxidant, has been proposed to attenuate exercise-induced muscle damage and modulate inflammatory and oxidative biomarkers during recovery. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024594742). Twelve randomized controlled trials involving adult participants exposed to different exercise protocols were included. Vitamin C supplementation, administered in various forms, was compared with placebo. Primary outcomes were inflammatory (CRP, IL-6) and oxidative stress (MDA) biomarkers. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework. RESULTS: Pooled analyses showed no significant effects of vitamin C supplementation on IL-6 (MD = 0.00; 95 % CI: -0.25 to 0.25; p = 1.00; 2 trials, n = 31) or MDA (MD = -0.59; 95 % CI: -1.99 to 0.81; p = 0.41; 3 trials, n = 41). A significant reduction was observed for CRP (MD = -0.44; 95 % CI: -0.66 to -0.22; p = 0.0001; 2 trials, n = 52). Heterogeneity was substantial for MDA (I2 = 80 %) but negligible for IL-6 and CRP (I2 = 0 %). Risk of bias was predominantly rated as "some concerns" or "high." According to GRADE, the certainty of evidence was low for IL-6 and CRP and very low for MDA due to risk of bias and imprecision. CONCLUSION: Based on a very limited number of small randomized trials, vitamin C supplementation does not appear to consistently modify post-exercise inflammatory or oxidative stress biomarkers. However, the available evidence is characterized by low to very low certainty, substantial methodological limitations, and imprecision. Therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution and considered hypothesis-generating, underscoring the need for larger, high-quality, well-controlled trials.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW International journal of molecular sciences (2026) PMID: 41683896 ↗
Therapeutic Effects of Vitamins in Endometriosis Patients: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in International journal of molecular sciences. Key conclusion: Despite physiological improvements, there was no statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates observed across the trials.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Endometriosis is a chronic, estrogen-dependent inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of women of reproductive age worldwide. It is characterized by the presence of endometrial-like tissue outside the uterine cavity, which frequently results in dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and infertility. While hormonal medications and surgical procedures are common treatments, they are often constrained by adverse effects and high recurrence rates. The aim was to systematically identify, critically appraise, and synthesize randomized controlled trials evaluating vitamin D, C, and E supplementation in women with endometriosis, focusing on their effects on pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, quality of life, oxidative and inflammatory biomarkers, and fertility-related outcomes, and to highlight methodological gaps that can inform future research and integrated therapeutic strategies. Following PRISMA guidelines, seven eligible RCTs were identified from databases including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. The quality of these studies was assessed using the Jadad Scoring System and Cochrane RoB 2 tool. High-dose supplementation of vitamin D (50,000 IU) was found to significantly reduce pelvic pain and improve biochemical markers such as hs-CRP and total antioxidant capacity (TAC). Vitamin D appears to modulate endometrial pathways by reducing active β-catenin protein activity, which may disrupt signaling associated with lesion invasion and survival. Additionally, combined Vitamin C and E therapy (typically 1000 mg/day of Vitamin C and 800 IU/day of Vitamin E) acts synergistically to scavenge free radicals. This intervention significantly decreased oxidative stress markers, including malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Patients reported significant improvements in symptoms, including a 43% reduction in daily pelvic pain and a 37% reduction in dysmenorrhea. Despite physiological improvements, there was no statistically significant increase in pregnancy rates observed across the trials. Vitamin supplementation with D, C, and E represents a safe, low-cost adjunct therapy that can effectively mitigate endometriosis-related oxida

10
META-ANALYSIS Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) (2026) PMID: 41615868 ↗
Comparative Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Stroke Prevention in Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) involving n = 673,624 participants (RR 0.23). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Future studies should prioritize high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes, different follow-up durations and specific stroke types to confirm the efficacy of these non-pharmacological interventions.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Existing guidelines lack comprehensive recommendations for stroke prevention. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in preventing total stroke and fatal stroke in high-risk adults. METHODS: We pooled only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Relative risks (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and P scores were computed to compare and rank the efficacy of interventions in preventing stroke. RESULTS: 50 RCTs with 673,624 participants were pooled in this study. Compared with the control group, Exercise + Education may decrease stroke risk (RR = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.07-0.73; low strength of evidence [SOE]), followed by Exercise (RR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.28-0.57; moderate SOE), Mediterranean diet (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.97; low SOE), and Vitamin B6 combined with B12 and folic acid (Vitamin B6 + B12 + folic acid) (RR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.95; moderate SOE). Only Salt substitute showed significantly reduced fatal stroke risk (RR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.68-0.90; high SOE). Exercise + Education (low SOE) and Exercise alone (moderate SOE) showed short-term benefits on preventing stroke, while Salt substitute had long-term effects on reducing fatal stroke risk (high SOE). Carotid endarterectomy (moderate SOE) and Vitamin C (high SOE) were significantly effective in preventing ischemic stroke, and Salt substitute (high SOE) showed significantly reduced hemorrhagic stroke and fatal hemorrhagic stroke risks. Vitamin B6 + B12 + folic acid may lower hemorrhagic stroke and transient ischemic attack risks (moderate SOE). CONCLUSION: Future studies should prioritize high-quality RCTs with large sample sizes, different follow-up durations and specific stroke types to confirm the efficacy of these non-pharmacological interventions. © 2026 S. Karger AG, Basel.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category