NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Vitamin D3 (Immune)

IMMUNE · Evidence Monograph

Vitamin D3 (Immune) is an evidence-graded immune monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 6,774 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (6 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 6,774
Reported Trial Dosages 7000 IU/day · 4000 IU/day · 800 IU/day
Trial Duration Range 12 weeks · 12 months · 52 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (7000 IU/day · 4000 IU/day · 800 IU/day) over a structured 12 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary immune clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (19 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (6 RCTs · 6 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (9 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is Vitamin D3 (Immune) & Why Does Form Matter?

Vitamin D3 (Immune) is classified under IMMUNE and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (7000 IU/day, 4000 IU/day, 800 IU/day).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Vitamin D3 (Immune) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Vitamin D3 (Immune) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Vitamin D3 (Immune) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (6 double-blind, n = 6,774 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41983136 (2026) — "Vitamin D status, supplementation, and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (No significant seasonal fluctuation in 25(OH)D levels was observed in MS patients; 2) Multivariable-adjusted analysis comparing the highest versus lowest serum 25(OH)D categories revealed that higher serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with a lower risk of MS onset and lower dis) • PMID:40332575 (2025) — "Updated Meta-Analysis on Vitamin Supplementation for Chronic Pruritus: Expanding Evidence Beyond Vitamin D." (Compared to placebo, vitamin supplementation demonstrated a significant reduction in pruritus severity (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: -0.578, 95% CI: -0.736 to -0.419, p = 0.000; I2 = 53.630, p = 0.003).) • PMID:38206745 (2023) — "Effects of vitamin D supplementation on autoantibodies and thyroid function in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation may have beneficial effects on HT patients by modulating immune responses and improving thyroid function.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)OR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 348715061.26PMID 337758181.26PMID 3377407400.2Null (1)5Metric: OR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 7000 IU/day · 4000 IU/day · 800 IU/day · 400 IU over 12 weeks · 12 months · 52 weeks · 24 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Vitamin D3 (Immune), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (7000 IU/day · 4000 IU/day · 800 IU/day) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 19 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in immunology (2026) PMID: 41983136 ↗
Vitamin D status, supplementation, and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in immunology. Key conclusion: No significant seasonal fluctuation in 25(OH)D levels was observed in MS patients; 2) Multivariable-adjusted analysis comparing the highest versus lowest serum 25(OH)D categories revealed that higher serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with a lower risk of MS onset and lower dis
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic immune-mediated neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system and a leading cause of disability among young adults. The disease exhibits considerable heterogeneity in clinical progression, with some patients experiencing more aggressive disease activity and a rapid decline in quality of life. Vitamin D plays a key role in immune regulation, and evidence suggests that its deficiency constitutes a significant environmental risk factor for immune-mediated conditions such as MS. While there are controversies regarding the role of serum 25(OH)D in MS as well as vitamin D3 supplements in controlling relapse and disability improvement during treatment. Therefore, our current meta-analysis aims to examine the relationship between serum 25(OH)D levels-and their modulation through supplementation-and multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Comprehensive literature review was performed from conception to November 17, 2025, employing various online databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The relevant studies about MS and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) level or vitamin D3 supplementation. This meta-analysis incorporated 40 research examining the correlation between serum 25(OH)D levels and multiple sclerosis, as well as 22 studies investigating the effects of vitamin D3 supplementation on multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: 1) The 25(OH)D levels in patients with MS were significantly lower than those in healthy controls. In the analysis of disease subtypes, patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) had significantly higher 25(OH)D levels than those with secondary progressive MS (SPMS), but no significant difference was observed compared to patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS). Additionally, RRMS patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels during relapse than during remission. No significant seasonal fluctuation in 25(OH)D levels was observed in MS patients; 2) Multivariable-adjusted analysis comparing the highest versus lowest serum 25(OH)D categories revealed that higher serum 25(OH)D levels were associated with a lower risk of MS onset and lower disability scores (EDSS), but no si

02
META-ANALYSIS International journal of molecular sciences (2025) PMID: 40332575 ↗
Updated Meta-Analysis on Vitamin Supplementation for Chronic Pruritus: Expanding Evidence Beyond Vitamin D.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of molecular sciences involving n = 1,723 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0. Key conclusion: Compared to placebo, vitamin supplementation demonstrated a significant reduction in pruritus severity (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: -0.578, 95% CI: -0.736 to -0.419, p = 0.000; I2 = 53.630, p = 0.003).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Chronic pruritus is a distressing condition associated with various dermatological and systemic diseases, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. While conventional treatments such as antihistamines and corticosteroids offer relief, their efficacy varies, and long-term use may lead to adverse effects. Emerging evidence suggests that certain vitamins, including vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin B12, and niacinamide (B3), may play a role in alleviating pruritus through their anti-inflammatory, immune-regulatory, and skin barrier-enhancing properties. However, the effectiveness of these vitamins in managing chronic pruritus remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to update and expand the evaluation of vitamin supplementation in reducing pruritus severity across different underlying conditions, extending the scope beyond vitamin D to include vitamins B and E. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to January 2025 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of vitamin supplementation on chronic pruritus. A total of 21 RCTs (n = 1723) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to placebo, vitamin supplementation demonstrated a significant reduction in pruritus severity (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD]: -0.578, 95% CI: -0.736 to -0.419, p = 0.000; I2 = 53.630, p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed that topical vitamin B12 and vitamin D3 showed the most pronounced antipruritic effects, particularly in patients with atopic dermatitis and chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the findings; however, potential publication bias was suggested by Egger's regression test (p = 0.00979), indicating that the overall effect may be influenced by small-study effects or underreporting of negative results. This meta-analysis indicates that vitamin B, D, and E supplementation may serve as effective adjunct therapies for managing chronic pruritus. However, the variability among the included studies highlights the necessity for well-structured, long-term RCTs to determine the ideal dosage, treatment duration, and target pati

03
META-ANALYSIS Medicine (2023) PMID: 38206745 ↗
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on autoantibodies and thyroid function in patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Medicine involving n = 862 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05 (SMD -1.084). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation may have beneficial effects on HT patients by modulating immune responses and improving thyroid function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) is the prevailing form of autoimmune thyroiditis and the leading cause of hypothyroidism in iodine-sufficient regions worldwide. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on HT through a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: The databases searched included PubMed, and others. We included RCTs that the treatment group received vitamin D, while the control group received either a placebo or no treatment. The studies measured the baseline and endpoint levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), free triiodothyronine (FT3), anti-thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPO-Ab), and thyroglobulin antibody (TG-Ab). We performed a meta-analysis to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 12 studies involving 862 individuals were included. Vitamin D supplementation has a significant impact on reducing the titers of TPO-Ab (SMD = -1.084, 95% CI = -1.624 to -0.545) and TG-Ab (SMD = -0.996, 95% CI = -1.579 to -0.413) in patients with HT, and it also improves thyroid function by decreasing TSH level (SMD = -0.167, 95% CI = -0.302 to 0.031) and increasing FT3 (SMD = 0.549, 95% CI = 0.077-1.020) and FT4 (SMD = 0.734, 95% CI = 0.184-1.285) levels. Active vitamin D (calcitriol) significantly reduces the titer of TPO-Ab compared to naive forms of vitamin D (vitamin D2 or D3); treatment durations > 12 weeks result in a more effective reduction of TPO-Ab levels and a more significant increase in FT4 and FT3 levels in patients with HT (meta-regression P < .05). CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation may have beneficial effects on HT patients by modulating immune responses and improving thyroid function.

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37571324 ↗
Psoriasis and Vitamin D: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients involving n = 173 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001. Key conclusion: It is shown that 25(OH)D serum levels are significantly lower in psoriasis, but, although the granularity of RCT methodology may have influenced the pooled analysis, vitamin D supplementation did not seem to improve clinical manifestations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-dysregulated inflammatory disease and hypovitaminosis D is considered a risk factor. We conducted an online database search to review and meta-analyze the relationship between vitamin D, other bone metabolism parameters, and psoriasis. The efficacy of oral vitamin D supplementation in improving Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was also evaluated. Non-original articles, case reports, and animal studies were excluded. Bias risk was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control studies, respectively. Unstandardized mean differences were used for data synthesis. Twenty-three studies reported serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels in 1876 psoriasis patients and 7532 controls. Psoriasis patients had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than controls (21.0 ± 8.3 vs. 27.3 ± 9.8, p < 0.00001). Conversely, 450 psoriasis patients had lower levels of parathormone than 417 controls (38.7 ± 12.8 vs. 43.7 ± 16.5, p = 0.015). Four RCTs examined the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation on psoriasis for 173 patients and 160 patients were treated with placebo. No significant differences were found in PASI after 3, 6, and 12 months of supplementation. It is shown that 25(OH)D serum levels are significantly lower in psoriasis, but, although the granularity of RCT methodology may have influenced the pooled analysis, vitamin D supplementation did not seem to improve clinical manifestations.

05
META-ANALYSIS The Journal of nutrition (2023) PMID: 36913447 ↗
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of the Effects of Vitamin D Supplementation on Children and Young Adults with HIV Infection.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in The Journal of nutrition involving n = 966 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.00001 (SMD 1.14). Key conclusion: A relatively high daily dose of vitamin D (1600-4000 IU) improves total BMD at 12 mo and results in sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Children and young adults with HIV infection may exhibit vitamin D deficiency, which is harmful to bone health as well as the endocrine and immune systems. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on children and young adults with HIV infection. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials that have evaluated the effects of vitamin D supplementation (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) at any dose or for any duration in children and young adults with HIV infection, aged 0-25 y, were included. A random-effects model was used, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: Ten trials, with 21 publications and 966 participants (mean age: 17.9 y), were included in the meta-analysis. The supplementation dose and the duration of the studies included ranged from 400 to 7000 IU/d and from 6 to 24 mo, respectively. Vitamin D supplementation was associated with a significantly higher serum 25(OH)D concentration at 12 mo (SMD: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.64, 1.65; P < 0.00001) compared with a placebo. No significant difference was observed in spine BMD (SMD: -0.09; 95% CI: -0.47, 0.3; P = 0.65) at 12 mo between these 2 groups. However, participants who received higher doses (1600-4000 IU/d) had significantly higher total BMD (SMD: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.44; P = 0.03) and nonsignificantly higher spine BMD (SMD: 0.3; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.61; P = 0.07) at 12 mo compared with those who received standard doses (400-800 IU/d). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation in children and young adults with HIV infection increases the serum 25(OH)D concentration. A relatively high daily dose of vitamin D (1600-4000 IU) improves total BMD at 12 mo and results in sufficient 25(OH)D concentrations.

06
CLINICAL STUDY International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition (2024) PMID: 36017738 ↗
The use of vitamin D for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in International journal for vitamin and nutrition research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Vitamin- und Ernahrungsforschung. Journal international de vitaminologie et de nutrition involving n = 1,209 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.05. Key conclusion: It effectively decreased inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ (p<0.05) and provided a reduction in disease activity assessed through different scores such as Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (p<0.05) and Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) (p<0.05).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

As vitamin D (VD) plays an essential role in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), this systematic review aimed to update the participation of this vitamin in the prevention or remission of these diseases. This review has included studies in MEDLINE-PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The authors have followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis) guidelines. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, twenty-two randomized clinical trials were selected. In total, 1,209 patients were included in this systematic review: 1034 received only VD and 175 received VD in combination with calcium. The average doses of VD supplementation were from oral 400 IU daily to 10,000 IU per kilogram of body weight. Single injection of 300,000 IU of VD was also used. Several studies have shown the crucial role that VD plays in the therapeutic approach of IBD due to its effects on the immune system. It effectively decreased inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IFN-γ (p<0.05) and provided a reduction in disease activity assessed through different scores such as Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) (p<0.05) and Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) (p<0.05). Unfortunately, the available clinical trials are not standardized for of doses and routes of administration. Existing meta-analyses are biased because they compare studies using different doses or treatments in combination with different drugs or supplements such as calcium. Even though VD has crucial effects on inflammatory processes, there is still a need for standardized studies to establish how the supplementation should be performed and the doses to be administered.

07
META-ANALYSIS The Journal of international medical research (2021) PMID: 34871506 ↗
Effects of vitamin D on thyroid autoimmunity markers in Hashimoto's thyroiditis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in The Journal of international medical research involving n = 652 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (OR 1.26). Key conclusion: As such, it has a possible protective role against the risk of respiratory tract infect
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on thyroid autoimmunity markers in Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT). METHODS: This meta-analysis included randomized controlled clinical trials identified by a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed®, MEDLINE®, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from inception to August 2020. All studies included patients with HT that received vitamin D supplementation irrespective of the doses administered or the duration of treatment. The primary and secondary outcome measures were thyroid peroxidase antibody (TPOAb) and/or thyroglobulin antibody (TGAb) titres. RESULTS: Eight studies (n = 652) were included. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies. Using a random-effect model, vitamin D supplementation reduced TPOAb titre (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1-1.92, -0.29) and TGAb titre (SMD: -1.12; 95% CI: -1.96, -0.28). A subgroup analysis demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation for >3 months resulted in a decrease in TPOAb titre (SMD: -1.66, 95% CI: -2.91, -0.41) but treatment ≤3 months was ineffective. Treatment with vitamin D3 decreased TPOAb titre (SMD: -1.48; 95% CI: -2.53, -0.42) whereas vitamin D did not. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that vitamin D reduces autoantibody titre in patients with HT. Therapeutic and prognostic role of vitamin D for COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies. Petrelli F(1), Luciani A(2), Perego G(3), Dognini G(4), Colombelli PL(4), Ghidini A(5). Author information: (1)Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. Electronic address: [email protected]. (2)Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. (3)Pharmacy Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Milano, Italy. (4)Internal Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. (5)Oncology Unit, Casa di cura Igea, Milano, Italy. Vitamin D modulates the systemic inflammatory response through interaction with immune system. As such, it has a possible protective role against the risk of respiratory tract infect

08
META-ANALYSIS The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology (2021) PMID: 33775818 ↗
Therapeutic and prognostic role of vitamin D for COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01 (OR 1.26). Key conclusion: Petrelli F(1), Luciani A(2), Perego G(3), Dognini G(4),
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

8. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2021 Jul;211:105883. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2021.105883. Epub 2021 Mar 26. Therapeutic and prognostic role of vitamin D for COVID-19 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 43 observational studies. Petrelli F(1), Luciani A(2), Perego G(3), Dognini G(4),

09
META-ANALYSIS Metabolism (2021) PMID: 33774074 ↗
The link between COVID-19 and VItamin D (VIVID): A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Metabolism involving n = 19 participants (OR 0.003). Key conclusion: Another small trial showed that supplementation with cholecalciferol, 60,000 IU/day, decreased fibrinogen levels, but did not have an effect on D-dimer, procalcitonin and CRP levels, compared to placebo.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Disease severity and mortality rates due to COVID-19 infection are greater in the elderly and chronically ill patients, populations at high risk for vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D plays an important role in immune function and inflammation. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the impact of vitamin D status and supplementation on COVID-19 related mortality and health outcomes. METHODS: We searched four databases until December 18th 2020, and trial registries until January 20th 2021. Two reviewers screened the studies, collected data, assessed the risk of bias, and graded the evidence for each outcome across studies, independently and in duplicate. Pre-specified outcomes of interest were mortality, ICU admission, invasive and non-invasive ventilation, hospitalization, time of hospital stay, disease severity and SARS-CoV-2 positivity. We only included data from peer-reviewed articles in our primary analyses. RESULTS: We identified 31 peer-reviewed observational studies. In our primary analysis, there was a positive trend between serum 25(OH)D level <20 ng/ml and an increased risk of mortality, ICU admission, invasive ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or SARS-CoV-2 positivity. However, these associations were not statistically significant. Mean 25(OH)D levels was 5.9 ng/ml (95% CI [-9.5, -2.3]) significantly lower in COVID-19 positive, compared to negative patients. The certainty of the evidence was very low. We identified 32 clinical trial protocols, but only three have published results to-date. The trials administer vitamin D doses of 357 to 60,000 IU/day, from one week to 12 months. Eight megatrials investigate the efficacy of vitamin D in outpatient populations. A pilot trial revealed a significant decrease in ICU admission with calcifediol, compared to placebo (OR = 0.003), but the certainty of the evidence was unclear. Another small trial showed that supplementation with cholecalciferol, 60,000 IU/day, decreased fibrinogen levels, but did not have an effect on D-dimer, procalcitonin and CRP levels, compared to placebo. The third trial did not find any effect of vitamin D supplementation on COVID-19 related health outcomes. CONCL

10
META-ANALYSIS European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy (2021) PMID: 31830258 ↗
Impact of vitamin D on cardiac structure and function in chronic kidney disease patients with hypovitaminosis D: a randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy involving n = 25 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation does not have beneficial effects on LV mass in CKD patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Vitamin D deficiency is associated with cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) yet the impact of supplementation is controversial. Previous active vitamin D supplementation studies did not show improvement in cardiac structure or function but the effect of native vitamin D supplementation in CKD patients with low vitamin D levels is unknown. We have addressed this question via both a randomized double-blind prospective study and a meta-analysis of three randomized placebo-controlled studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in stable, non-diabetic, CKD three to four patients with circulating vitamin D <75nmol/L, who were receiving treatment with ACEi or ARB and had high-normal left ventricular (LV) mass. Patients were randomized to receive six directly observed doses of 100 000 IU cholecalciferol (n = 25) or matched placebo (n = 23). The primary endpoint was changed in LV mass index (LVMI) over 52 weeks, as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary endpoints included changes in LV ejection fraction (LVEF); LV and right ventricular volumes and left and right atrial area. Vitamin D concentration increased with the administration of cholecalciferol. The change in LVMI with cholecalciferol [median (inter-quartile range), -0.25 g (-7.20 to 5.30)] was no different from placebo [-4.30 g (9.70 to 2.60)]. There was no difference in changes of LVEF; LV and right ventricular volumes and left and right atrial area. The meta-analysis of three 52-week, randomized placebo-controlled studies using active/native vitamin D supplementation showed no differences in LVMI measurements. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D supplementation does not have beneficial effects on LV mass in CKD patients. © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category