NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Yohimbine

BOTANICALS · Evidence Monograph

Yohimbine is an evidence-graded botanicals monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (1 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews, and 1 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 1,668 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 1 Meta · 6 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 1 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 1,668
Reported Trial Dosages 5,000 mg · 10 mg · 400 mg
Trial Duration Range 26 weeks · 57 weeks · 52 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (5,000 mg · 10 mg · 400 mg) over a structured 26 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract
Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch
Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
weight (PubMed clinical endpoint)
diabetes (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Yohimbine & Why Does Form Matter?

Yohimbine is classified under BOTANICALS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (5,000 mg, 10 mg, 400 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Yohimbine frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (1 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Yohimbine acts on pathways governing phytochemical receptor modulation, adaptogenic stress response, and vascular/inflammatory pathways. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Yohimbine an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 1 meta-analyses, 6 systematic reviews, and 1 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 1,668 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:30770070 (2019) — "The Potential Role of Arginine Supplements on Erectile Dysfunction: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis." (CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta) • PMID:15674929 (2005) — "Pharmacotherapy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus." (Some studies, using a variety of study designs, were available on other drugs and a significant decrease in weight was noted in three studies of mazindol, one of phenmetrazine, two of phentermine.) • PMID:40658855 (2025) — "Dissociable glucocorticoid and noradrenergic effects on parochial cooperation and competition in intergroup conflict." (Consistent with our hypotheses, glucocorticoid activation increased generosity toward the in-group, whereas noradrenergic activation increased parochial competition, i.e., prosocial in-group support combined with hostility toward the out-group.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Standardized Marker-Compound Botanical Extract. Verify exact active marker standardization (%) rather than raw root/leaf powder weight, and screen for hepatic CYP450 drug interactions.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 5,000 mg · 10 mg · 400 mg · 30 μg over 26 weeks · 57 weeks · 52 weeks · 3 days. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch (Post-meal administration buffers concentrated botanical tannins and organic acids against gastric mucosal irritation.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Gradual physiological adaptation over 4–12 weeks without gastric burning or daytime sedation.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Stop immediately if unexplained fatigue, dark urine, skin rash, or right-upper-quadrant discomfort occurs.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MAJOR] / (MAOI, TCA): Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:8198928). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · Immediately After Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (5,000 mg · 10 mg · 400 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 26 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking / (MAOI, TCA).
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 14 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS The journal of sexual medicine (2019) PMID: 30770070 ↗
The Potential Role of Arginine Supplements on Erectile Dysfunction: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of sexual medicine involving n = 540 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of arginine supplements in erectile dysfunction (ED) remain debatable. AIM: To assess the potential role of arginine supplements on ED as alternatives to phosphodiesterase inhibitors. METHODS: Studies published up to April 2018 that evaluated the efficacy of arginine supplements were identified from multiple databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Kiss, DBpia, and Cochrane databases). Studies comparing arginine supplements with placebo or no treatment; focusing only on patients with mild to moderate severity of ED; and presenting outcomes such as improvement rate, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, and adverse effects were included. Subgroup analysis for arginine alone and arginine in combination with other substances was further conducted to increase interpretability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The strength of the association between arginine supplements and ED was assessed using relative odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% CI. RESULTS: In total, 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 540 patients with ED. The analysis demonstrated that arginine supplements with dosage ranging from 1,500 to 5,000 mg significantly improved ED compared with placebo or no treatment (odds ratios, 3.37 [1.29, 8.77], P = .01, I2 = 44). Arginine supplements also caused significant improvements in the IIEF subdomain scores of overall satisfaction, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, and erectile function, whereas the IIEF sexual desire score remain unchanged. The adverse effect rate in the arginine-treated group was 8.3%, and that in the placebo group was 2.3%, none of which were severe. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Arginine supplements can be recommended to patients with mild to moderate ED. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The strength of this study is that it is the first meta-analysis to assess the potential role of arginine supplements in ED compared with placebo or no treatment. A limitation is that the treatment dosage and duration varied among studies, which may have contributed to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta

02
CLINICAL STUDY The Cochrane database of systematic reviews (2005) PMID: 15674929 ↗
Pharmacotherapy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2005 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews involving n = 296 participants. Key conclusion: Some studies, using a variety of study designs, were available on other drugs and a significant decrease in weight was noted in three studies of mazindol, one of phenmetrazine, two of phentermine.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Obesity is closely related to type 2 diabetes and long-term weight reduction is an important part of the care delivered to obese persons with diabetes. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of pharmacotherapy for weight loss in adults with type 2 diabetes. SEARCH STRATEGY: Computerized searches were performed of MEDLINE (January 1966 to May 2004), EMBASE (January 1974 to May 2004, Web of Science (January 1981 to May 2004, and other electronic bibliographic databases, supplemented with hand searches of reference lists and selected journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, controlled trials were included where pharmacotherapy was used as the primary strategy for weight loss among adults with type 2 diabetes. Published and unpublished literature in any language and with any study design was included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers abstracted data and the quality of included studies was evaluated by assessing potential attrition, as well as selection and measurement bias, and a Jadad score was obtained. Effects were combined using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS: A sufficient number of studies were available for a quantitative synthesis for fluoxetine, orlistat, and sibutramine. Twenty two randomized controlled trials were included in the review, with a total of 296 participants for fluoxitine, 2036 for orlistat, and 1047 for sibutramine. Pharmacotherapy produced modest reductions in weight for fluoxetine (5.1 kg (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3 - 6.9) at 24 to 26 weeks follow up; orlistat 2.0 kg (CI, 1.3 - 2.8) at 12 to 57 weeks follow-up, and sibutramine 5.1 kg (CI, 3.2 - 7.0) at 12 to 52 weeks follow-up. Glycated hemoglobin also modestly and significantly reduced for fluoxetine and orlistat. Gastrointestinal side effects were common with orlistat; tremor, somnolence and sweating with fluoxetine; and palpitations with sibutramine. Some studies, using a variety of study designs, were available on other drugs and a significant decrease in weight was noted in three studies of mazindol, one of phenmetrazine, two of phentermine. No studies were identified that fit inclusion criteria for pseudophedrine, ephedra, sertraline, yohimbine, amphet

03
CLINICAL STUDY Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2025) PMID: 40658855 ↗
Dissociable glucocorticoid and noradrenergic effects on parochial cooperation and competition in intergroup conflict.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Key conclusion: Consistent with our hypotheses, glucocorticoid activation increased generosity toward the in-group, whereas noradrenergic activation increased parochial competition, i.e., prosocial in-group support combined with hostility toward the out-group.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Stress changes social behavior, yet its effects remain contradictory. Traditionally, stress was thought to trigger an antagonistic fight-or-flight response aimed at eliminating the stressor. However, recent studies have revealed the opposite response, tend-and-befriend, where individuals prosocially invest in their social network in exchange for support and mutual protection. We hypothesize that stress does not promote one response over the other; instead, it stimulates both behaviors, dissociable on the neuropharmacological level and moderated by social context. In a placebo-controlled, double-blind psychopharmacological study, we administered hydrocortisone and yohimbine-alone or in combination-to manipulate the actions of the main stress hormone cortisol and the arousal transmitter noradrenaline. Participants then made decisions in an intergroup conflict task. They teamed up with others to form an in-group and played against multiple out-groups. Notably, out-group members initiated financial harm to in-group participants before these responded. Participants then chose either to 1) maximize their own payoff, 2) cooperatively increase the payoff of their in-group, or 3) increase the in-group's payoff while competitively decreasing that of the out-group. Consistent with our hypotheses, glucocorticoid activation increased generosity toward the in-group, whereas noradrenergic activation increased parochial competition, i.e., prosocial in-group support combined with hostility toward the out-group. These findings challenge the dichotomy between fight-or-flight and tend-and-befriend, suggesting stress-related behavior is neither static nor one-directional, but shaped by the relative dominance of cortisol versus noradrenaline in the neurohormonal stress response and by intergroup dynamics. We highlight broader societal implications, offering a potential biological mechanism underlying the self-perpetuating cycle of intergroup conflict.

04
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) (2024) PMID: 38902928 ↗
Effects of stress-related neuromodulators on amygdala and hippocampus resting state functional connectivity.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) involving n = 165 participants. Key conclusion: Compared to placebo, we found no differences in the groups receiving only one medication, suggesting that increasing one neuromodulator alone may not induce differences in neurofunctional responses.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The human stress response is characterized by increases in neuromodulators, including norepinephrine (NE) and cortisol. Both neuromodulators can enter the brain and affect neurofunctional responses. Two brain areas associated with stress are the amygdala and the hippocampus. The precise influence of NE and cortisol on the amygdala and hippocampal resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) is poorly understood. AIMS: To investigate the influence of NE and cortisol on the amygdala and hippocampal RSFC. METHODS: We recruited 165 participants who received 10 mg yohimbine and/or 10 mg hydrocortisone in a randomized, placebo-controlled design. With seed-based analyses, we compared RSFC of the hippocampus and amygdala separately between the three groups that received medication versus placebo. RESULTS: We found no differences between yohimbine and placebo condition or between hydrocortisone and placebo condition regarding amygdala or hippocampal FC. Compared with placebo, the yohimbine/hydrocortisone condition showed increased amygdala and hippocampal RSFC with the cerebellum. Also, they had increased hippocampal RSFC with the amygdala and cerebral white matter. DISCUSSION: The group with elevated NE and cortisol showed significantly increased RSFC between the amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum compared to placebo. These three brain areas are involved in associative learning and emotional memory, suggesting a critical role for this network in the human stress response. Our results show that NE and cortisol together may influence the strength of this association. Compared to placebo, we found no differences in the groups receiving only one medication, suggesting that increasing one neuromodulator alone may not induce differences in neurofunctional responses. The study procedure has been registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT04359147).

05
CLINICAL STUDY Psychoneuroendocrinology (2024) PMID: 38581746 ↗
The effects of yohimbine and hydrocortisone on selective attention to fearful faces: An fMRI study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Psychoneuroendocrinology involving n = 41 participants. Key conclusion: Suitability of the dot-probe task for fMRI studies and insignificant treatment effects are discussed.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Selective attention to salient emotional information can enable an advantage in the face of danger. The present study aims to investigate the influence of the stress neuromodulators, norepinephrine and cortisol, on selective attention processes to fearful faces and its neuronal activation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design. 167 healthy men between 18 and 35 years (mean [SD] age: 25.23 [4.24] years) participated in the study. Participants received either: (A) yohimbine (n= 41), (B) hydrocortisone (n = 41), (C) yohimbine and hydrocortisone (n = 42) or (D) placebo only (n= 43) and participated in a dot-probe task with fearful and neutral faces in an fMRI scanner. RESULTS: We found an attentional bias toward fearful faces across all groups and related neuronal activation in the left cuneus. We did not find any differences between experimental treatment groups in selective attention and its neuronal activation. DISCUSSION: Our results provide evidence that fearful faces lead to an attentional bias with related neuronal activation in the left cuneus. We did not replicate formerly reported activation in the amygdala, intraparietal sulcus, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and thalamus. Suitability of the dot-probe task for fMRI studies and insignificant treatment effects are discussed.

06
CLINICAL STUDY Social cognitive and affective neuroscience (2024) PMID: 38123464 ↗
No changes in triple network engagement following (combined) noradrenergic and glucocorticoid stimulation in healthy men.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Social cognitive and affective neuroscience involving n = 165 participants. Key conclusion: At a cellular level, this involves (slow genomic) actions of cortisol, which alter or reverse rapid effects of noradrenaline and cortisol associated with acute stress.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Successful recovery from stress is integral for adaptive responding to the environment. At a cellular level, this involves (slow genomic) actions of cortisol, which alter or reverse rapid effects of noradrenaline and cortisol associated with acute stress. At the network scale, stress recovery is less well understood but assumed to involve changes within salience-, executive control-, and default mode networks. To date, few studies have investigated this phase and directly tested these assumptions. Here, we present results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, between-group paradigm (N = 165 healthy males) administering 10 mg oral yohimbine and/or 10 mg oral hydrocortisone two hours prior to resting state scanning. We found no changes in within-network connectivity of the three networks, both after single and combined drug administration. We further report the results of Bayesian parameter inference to provide evidence for the null hypothesis. Our results contrast with previous findings, which may be attributable to systematic differences between paradigms, highlighting the need to isolate paradigm-specific effects from those related to stress. © The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.

07
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (2024) PMID: 38114885 ↗
Evaluation of Hydroxychloroquine as a Perpetrator on Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A and CYP2D6 Activity with Microdosed Probe Drugs in Healthy Volunteers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0007. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed an increased midazolam exposure most likely related to pantoprazole.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although polypharmacy is a particular challenge in daily rheumatological practice, clinical research on the effects of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), a commonly used drug for patients with rheumatic diseases, is sparse on cytochrome P450 (CYP)-mediated metabolism. We have shown that pre-treatment with pantoprazole does not alter HCQ absorption in healthy volunteers. In this paper, we report the effects of a single 400 mg dose of HCQ on specific CYP3A and CYP2D6 substrates in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In the trial, participants were randomized into two groups (HCQ plus a 9-day course of pantoprazole, or HCQ only). As a secondary endpoint, the effects of a single oral dose of HCQ on the exposure of the oral microdosed CYP3A probe drug midazolam (30 μg) and the oral microdosed CYP2D6 probe drug yohimbine (50 μg) were studied in 23 healthy volunteers (EudraCT no. 2020-001470-30, registered 31 March 2020). RESULTS: The exposure of the probe drugs after intake of HCQ compared with baseline values was quantified by the partial area under the plasma concentration-time curve 0-6 h after administration (AUC0-6 h) for yohimbine and the partial AUC2-4 h for midazolam. Under HCQ, yohimbine AUC0-6 h was unchanged, independent of CYP2D6 genotypes and pantoprazole exposure. Midazolam AUC2-4 h was 25% higher on the day of HCQ administration than at baseline (p = 0.0007). This significant increase was driven by the pantoprazole subgroup, which showed a 46% elevation of midazolam AUC2-4 h as compared with baseline (p < 0.0001). The ratio of midazolam to 1-OH-midazolam partial AUC2-4 h significantly increased from 3.03 ± 1.59 (baseline) to 3.60 ± 1.56 (HCQ) in the pantoprazole group (p = 0.0026). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we observed an increased midazolam exposure most likely related to pantoprazole. © 2023. The Author(s).

08
CLINICAL STUDY Addiction biology (2023) PMID: 37369125 ↗
Mifepristone as a pharmacological intervention for stress-induced alcohol craving: A human laboratory study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Addiction biology involving n = 32 participants. Key conclusion: This study successfully translated a developed preclinical procedure to a human laboratory study, confirming the safety of mifepristone in people with AUD and providing evidence to its role in reducing alcohol craving under stress procedures.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Update of medRxiv. 2023 Jan 04:2023.01.02.23284122. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.02.23284122. Preclinical and clinical work suggests that mifepristone may be a viable treatment for alcohol use disorder (AUD). This was a Phase 1/2, outpatient, cross-over, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with non-treatment-seeking individuals with AUD (N = 32). We assessed safety, alcohol craving and consumption, after 1-week mifepristone 600 mg/day administration, in a human laboratory study comprised of a single oral yohimbine administration (32.4 mg), a cue-reactivity procedure and alcohol self-administration. Safety was monitored by adverse events and hemodynamic parameters, alcohol craving by alcohol craving questionnaire and cue-induced saliva output. During the alcohol self-administration, we assessed alcohol pharmacokinetics, subjective effects and consumption. Outcomes were assessed using Generalized Estimating Equations and mediation analysis. Mild-moderate adverse events were reported in both conditions. There was no statistically significant difference between mifepristone and placebo in alcohol pharmacokinetics and subjective effects. Furthermore, blood pressure increased only in the placebo condition after the stress-induced laboratory procedures. Mifepristone, compared to placebo, significantly reduced alcohol craving and increased cortisol levels. Mifepristone-induced cortisol increase was not a mediator of alcohol craving. Mifepristone, compared to placebo, did not reduce alcohol consumption in the laboratory or in a naturalistic setting. This study successfully translated a developed preclinical procedure to a human laboratory study, confirming the safety of mifepristone in people with AUD and providing evidence to its role in reducing alcohol craving under stress procedures. The lack of effects on alcohol drinking may be related to the selection of non-treatment seekers and suggests future treatment-oriented trials should investigate mifepristone in people with AUD. © 2023 Society for the Study of Addiction.

09
CLINICAL STUDY Psychopharmacology (2023) PMID: 37314480 ↗
The effects of hydrocortisone and yohimbine on human behavior in approach-avoidance conflicts.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Psychopharmacology involving n = 48 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The investigated major stress mediators were not sufficient to imitate previously shown stress effects on approach-avoidance conflict behavior.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

RATIONALE: Balancing approach of positive and avoidance of negative stimuli is essential when faced with approach-avoidance conflicts, e.g., situations with both positive and negative outcomes. This balance is disturbed in several mental disorders, e.g., excessive avoidance in anxiety disorders, and heightened approach in substance use disorders. Since stress is assumed to impact these disorders' etiology and maintenance, it seems crucial to understand how stress influences behavior in approach-avoidance conflicts. Indeed, some studies suggested altered approach-avoidance behavior under acute stress, but the mechanism underlying these effects is unknown. OBJECTIVES: Investigate how the pharmacological manipulation of major stress mediators (cortisol and noradrenaline) influences task-based approach-avoidance conflict behavior in healthy individuals. METHODS: Ninety-six participants (48 women, 48 men) received either 20mg hydrocortisone, 20mg yohimbine, both, or placebo before performing a task targeting foraging under predation in a fully crossed double-blind between-subject design. Moreover, we investigated effects of gender and endogenous testosterone and estradiol levels on approach-avoidance behavior. RESULTS: While biological stress markers (cortisol concentration, alpha amylase activity) indicated successful pharmacological manipulation, behavior in approach-avoidance conflicts was not affected as expected. Although yohimbine administration affected risky foraging latency under predation, we found no main effect of hydrocortisone or their interaction on behavior. In contrast, we found gender differences for almost all behavioral outcome measures, which might be explained by differences in endogenous testosterone levels. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated major stress mediators were not sufficient to imitate previously shown stress effects on approach-avoidance conflict behavior. We discuss potential reasons for our findings and implications for future research. © 2023. The Author(s).

10
CLINICAL STUDY The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology (2022) PMID: 35748393 ↗
Alpha-2 Adrenoreceptor Antagonist Yohimbine Potentiates Consolidation of Conditioned Fear.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Clinical Study published in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology involving n = 51 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that yohimbine potentiates cardiac and central electrophysiological signatures of fear memory consolidation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Hyperconsolidation of aversive associations and poor extinction learning have been hypothesized to be crucial in the acquisition of pathological fear. Previous animal and human research points to the potential role of the catecholaminergic system, particularly noradrenaline and dopamine, in acquiring emotional memories. Here, we investigated in a between-participants design with 3 groups whether the noradrenergic alpha-2 adrenoreceptor antagonist yohimbine and the dopaminergic D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride modulate long-term fear conditioning and extinction in humans. METHODS: Fifty-five healthy male students were recruited. The final sample consisted of n = 51 participants who were explicitly aware of the contingencies between conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli after fear acquisition. The participants were then randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups and received either yohimbine (10 mg, n = 17), sulpiride (200 mg, n = 16), or placebo (n = 18) between fear acquisition and extinction. Recall of conditioned (non-extinguished CS+ vs CS-) and extinguished fear (extinguished CS+ vs CS-) was assessed 1 day later, and a 64-channel electroencephalogram was recorded. RESULTS: The yohimbine group showed increased salivary alpha-amylase activity, confirming a successful manipulation of central noradrenergic release. Elevated fear-conditioned bradycardia and larger differential amplitudes of the N170 and late positive potential components in the event-related brain potential indicated that yohimbine treatment (compared with a placebo and sulpiride) enhanced fear recall during day 2. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that yohimbine potentiates cardiac and central electrophysiological signatures of fear memory consolidation. They thereby elucidate the key role of noradrenaline in strengthening the consolidation of conditioned fear associations, which may be a key mechanism in the etiology of fear-related disorders. © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category