NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Ceramides (Oral)

SKIN HAIR · Evidence Monograph

Ceramides (Oral) is an evidence-graded skin hair monograph evaluated across 17 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (0 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 325 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) Moderate (3.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 17 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 0 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 325
Reported Trial Dosages 1000 mg · 100 mg · 60 mg
Trial Duration Range 1 months · 6 months · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~9 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 17 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE Moderate).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (1000 mg · 100 mg · 60 mg) over a structured 1 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
brain (PubMed clinical endpoint)
skin (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Ceramides (Oral) & Why Does Form Matter?

Ceramides (Oral) is classified under SKIN HAIR and has been investigated across 17 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (1000 mg, 100 mg, 60 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Ceramides (Oral) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Ceramides (Oral) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Ceramides (Oral) an overall evidence rating of GRADE Moderate (3.0 / 4.0) based on 17 PubMed studies: 0 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 325 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41519901 (2026) — "Lucerastat, an oral therapy for Fabry disease: results from a pivotal randomized phase 3 study and its open-label extension." (In contrast, a decrease in baseline plasma Gb3 was observed at Month-6 in lucerastat-treated participants but not placebo-treated participants (LSM difference -873.53 ng/mL [95% CI -1097.53, -649.53], p < 0.0001; NS due to hierarchical testing).) • PMID:40923969 (2025) — "Enhanced Versus Standard Dermatologic Management With Amivantamab-Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: The COCOON Global Randomized Controlled Trial." (CONCLUSION: An uncomplicated, widely available, prophylactic regimen (COCOON DM) reduced the incidence of DAEIs with amivantamab-lazertinib and the impact of symptoms on QoL.) • PMID:38999848 (2024) — "Efficacy and Safety of Oral Administration of Wine Lees Extract (WLE)-Derived Ceramides and Glucosylceramides in Enhancing Skin Barrier Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study." (CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation of WLE-derived ceramides and glucosylceramides is a prominent and safe approach to enhancing skin barrier function and health.)

05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 1000 mg · 100 mg · 60 mg · 30 mg over 1 months · 6 months · 12 weeks · 8 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Ceramides (Oral), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (1000 mg · 100 mg · 60 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 1 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (17 Studies) · 4 Quantitative Analyses

01
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nature communications (2026) PMID: 41519901 ↗
Lucerastat, an oral therapy for Fabry disease: results from a pivotal randomized phase 3 study and its open-label extension.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nature communications involving n = 80 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.32. Key conclusion: In contrast, a decrease in baseline plasma Gb3 was observed at Month-6 in lucerastat-treated participants but not placebo-treated participants (LSM difference -873.53 ng/mL [95% CI -1097.53, -649.53], p < 0.0001; NS due to hierarchical testing).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In Fabry disease (FD, OMIM #301500), a rare lysosomal storage disorder, the glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor lucerastat acts as substrate reduction therapy. The Phase 3, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 6-month, randomized clinical trial, MODIFY (NCT03425539), aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lucerastat in adults with FD with moderate-to-severe neuropathic pain. The single-arm, open-label extension (OLE) (NCT03737214) evaluated the longer-term safety and tolerability of lucerastat over 72 months. Lucerastat 1000 mg twice daily (n = 80), compared with placebo (n = 37), failed to affect neuropathic pain at Month-6, with no significant difference between treatment groups (LSM difference -0.42 [95% CI -1.23, 0.40], p = 0.32) (primary endpoint). In contrast, a decrease in baseline plasma Gb3 was observed at Month-6 in lucerastat-treated participants but not placebo-treated participants (LSM difference -873.53 ng/mL [95% CI -1097.53, -649.53], p < 0.0001; NS due to hierarchical testing). In an unplanned OLE Month-18 interim analysis, the eGFR slope (mL/min/1.73m2/year) in 93 participants with pre- and post-randomization (23-month median lucerastat exposure) eGFR data was -3.50 (-5.04, -1.969) and -1.48 (-2.64, -0.33), respectively. Lucerastat was safe and well tolerated. Lucerastat's strong pharmacodynamic effect did not translate into an effect on neuropathic pain. The potential effect of lucerastat on renal function requires further investigation (Trial registration NCT03425539, NCT03737214; 2017-003369-85, 2018-002210-12. The studies were sponsored by Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd). © 2026. The Author(s).

02
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of thoracic oncology (2025) PMID: 40923969 ↗
Enhanced Versus Standard Dermatologic Management With Amivantamab-Lazertinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: The COCOON Global Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of thoracic oncology involving n = 201 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (OR 0.24). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: An uncomplicated, widely available, prophylactic regimen (COCOON DM) reduced the incidence of DAEIs with amivantamab-lazertinib and the impact of symptoms on QoL.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Amivantamab plus lazertinib significantly improved progression-free and overall survival versus osimertinib in patients with previously untreated, EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC. EGFR-targeted therapies are associated with dermatologic adverse events (AEs), which can affect quality of life (QoL). COCOON was conducted to assess prophylactic management and improve treatment experience. METHODS: In the phase 2 COCOON study (NCT06120140), participants with previously untreated, EGFR-mutant, locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC received intravenous amivantamab plus oral lazertinib and were randomized 1:1 to enhanced dermatologic management (COCOON DM) or standard of care (SoC DM) per local guidelines. COCOON DM included oral doxycycline or minocycline (100 mg twice daily; weeks 1-12), clindamycin 1% (on scalp daily; weeks 13-52), chlorhexidine 4% (on fingernails and toenails daily), and ceramide-based moisturizer (on body and face at least daily). Primary end point was incidence of grade 2 or higher dermatologic AEs of interest (DAEIs) by week 12. RESULTS: In total, 201 participants were randomized (99 to COCOON DM and 102 to SoC DM). At a median follow-up of 7.1 months, COCOON DM demonstrated significant reduction in the primary end point versus SoC DM (42% versus 75%; OR, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.45; p < 0.0001). By week 12, the largest benefit with COCOON DM was observed in DAEIs involving the face and body (excludes paronychia; 26% versus 60%; p < 0.0001) and DAEIs involving the scalp (10% versus 26%; p = 0.0049). This benefit was maintained at 6 months, with significant reductions of DAEIs involving face, body, and scalp (excluding paronychia). Patient-reported outcomes favored COCOON DM, indicating reduced impact of dermatologic symptoms on QoL. CONCLUSION: An uncomplicated, widely available, prophylactic regimen (COCOON DM) reduced the incidence of DAEIs with amivantamab-lazertinib and the impact of symptoms on QoL.

03
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2024) PMID: 38999848 ↗
Efficacy and Safety of Oral Administration of Wine Lees Extract (WLE)-Derived Ceramides and Glucosylceramides in Enhancing Skin Barrier Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 15 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.07. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation of WLE-derived ceramides and glucosylceramides is a prominent and safe approach to enhancing skin barrier function and health.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Our search for plant-derived ceramides from sustainable sources led to the discovery of ceramides and glucosylceramides in wine lees. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of wine lees extract (WLE)-derived ceramides and glucosylceramides in enhancing skin barrier function. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted with 30 healthy Japanese subjects aged 20-64. Subjects were allocated to receive either the WLE-derived ceramides and glucosylceramides (test group) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and secondary outcomes included skin hydration, visual analog scale (VAS) of itching sensation, and the Japanese Skindex-29. RESULTS: One participant withdrew for personal reasons, resulting in 29 subjects for data analysis (placebo n = 15; test n = 14). The test group showed a tendency of lower TEWL compared to the placebo after 8 weeks (p = 0.07). Furthermore, after 12 weeks of administration, the test group had significantly lower TEWL than the placebo (p = 0.04). On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in the secondary outcome parameters. No adverse events related to the supplements were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Oral supplementation of WLE-derived ceramides and glucosylceramides is a prominent and safe approach to enhancing skin barrier function and health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (UMIN000050422).

04
CLINICAL STUDY Clinical drug investigation (2024) PMID: 38698285 ↗
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oral AL01211 in Healthy Chinese Volunteers.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Clinical drug investigation. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: AL01211 showed a favorable pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability profile in healthy Chinese volunteers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Aberrant accumulation of glycosphingolipids (GSLs) in the lysosome leads to GSL storage diseases. Glucosylceramide synthase inhibitors (GCSi) have the potential to treat several GSL storage diseases by reducing the synthesis of the disease-causing GSLs. AL01211 is a potent oral GCSi under investigation for Type 1 Gaucher disease and Fabry disease. Here, we evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of AL01211 in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: AL01211 was tested in a Phase 1, single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with single-dose (15 and 60 mg) and multiple-dose (30 mg) arms. RESULTS: Results of AL01211 demonstrated dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, rapid absorption (median time to maximum plasma concentration [tmax] 2.5-4 hours), relatively slow clearance rate (mean apparent total clearance from plasma [CL/F] 88.3-200 L/h) and the mean terminal half-life above 30 hours. Repeated once-daily oral administration of AL01211 for 14 days had an approximately 2-fold accumulation, reaching steady-state levels between 7 and 10 days, and led to a 73% reduction in plasma glucosylceramide (GL1) on Day 14. AL01211 was safe and well tolerated, with no identified serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: AL01211 showed a favorable pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability profile in healthy Chinese volunteers. These data support the further clinical development of AL01211 as a therapy for GSL storage diseases. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: Clinical Trial Registry no. CTR20221202 ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn ) registered on 6 June 2022 and ChiCTR2200061431 ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) registered on 24 June 2022. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

05
CLINICAL STUDY Clinical pharmacology in drug development (2024) PMID: 38363061 ↗
Phase 1 Healthy Volunteer Study of AL01211, an Oral, Non-brain Penetrant Glucosylceramide Synthase Inhibitor, to Treat Fabry Disease and Type 1 Gaucher Disease.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Clinical Study published in Clinical pharmacology in drug development. Key conclusion: Increasing exposure inversely correlated with a decrease in GSL with plasma glucosylceramide and globotriacylceramide reduction from baseline levels, reaching 78% and 52% by day 14, respectively.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Glycosphingolipid (GSL) storage diseases are caused by deficiencies in the enzymes that metabolize different GSLs in the lysosome. Glucosylceramide synthase (GCS) inhibitors reduce GSL production and have potential to treat multiple GSL storage diseases. AL01211 is a potent, oral GCS inhibitor being developed for the treatment of Type 1 Gaucher disease and Fabry disease. AL01211 has minimal central nervous system penetration, allowing for treatment of peripheral organs without risking CNS-associated adverse effects. AL01211 was evaluated in a Phase 1 healthy volunteer study with single ascending dose (SAD) and multiple ascending dose (MAD) arms, to determine safety, pharmacokinetics including food effect, and pharmacodynamic effects on associated GSLs. In the SAD arm, AL01211 showed a Tmax of approximately 3.5 hours, mean clearance (CL/F) of 130.1 L/h, and t1/2 of 39.3 hours. Consuming a high-fat meal prior to dose administration reduced exposures 3.5-5.5-fold, indicating a food effect. In the MAD arm, AL01211 had an approximately 2-fold accumulation, reaching steady-state levels by 10 days. Increasing exposure inversely correlated with a decrease in GSL with plasma glucosylceramide and globotriacylceramide reduction from baseline levels, reaching 78% and 52% by day 14, respectively. AL01211 was generally well-tolerated with no AL01211 associated serious adverse events, thus supporting its further clinical development. © 2024 AceLink Therapeutics. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

06
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) JAMA network open (2022) PMID: 35050355 ↗
Effect of Urolithin A Supplementation on Muscle Endurance and Mitochondrial Health in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in JAMA network open involving n = 29 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Venglustat showed favorable safety and tolerability in MOVES-PD Part 1 and target engagement was achieved in CSF.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) mutations influence risk and prognosis of Parkinson's disease (PD), possibly through accumulation of glycosphingolipids, including glucosylceramide (GL-1). Venglustat is a novel, brain penetrant glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate venglustat pharmacology, safety, and tolerability in patients with PD and GBA mutations (GBA-PD). METHODS: Part 1 of the phase 2 MOVES-PD trial (NCT02906020) was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation study performed in six countries. Eligible participants included Japanese and non-Japanese patients aged 18-80 years with PD diagnosis and heterozygous GBA mutation. Participants were randomized to three doses of once-daily oral venglustat or placebo and were followed up to 36 weeks (Japanese participants: 52 weeks). Primary endpoint was venglustat safety and tolerability versus placebo. Secondary and exploratory endpoints included venglustat pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. RESULTS: Participants (N = 29) received venglustat (Japanese, n = 9; non-Japanese, n = 13) or placebo (n = 3; n = 4). Eight (89%) Japanese and 12 (92%) non-Japanese venglustat-treated participants experienced at least one adverse event (AE) versus two (67%) and four (100%) participants from the respective placebo groups. Most AEs were mild or moderate; no serious AEs or deaths occurred. Two venglustat-treated non-Japanese participants discontinued due to AEs (confusional state and panic attack). Over 4 weeks, venglustat exposure in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) increased, and GL-1 levels in plasma and CSF decreased, both in a dose-dependent manner. At the highest dose, CSF GL-1 decreased by 72.0% in Japanese and 74.3% in non-Japanese participants. CONCLUSION: Venglustat showed favorable safety and tolerability in MOVES-PD Part 1 and target engagement was achieved in CSF.

07
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Journal of Parkinson's disease (2022) PMID: 34897099 ↗
Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Venglustat in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and a GBA Mutation: Results from Part 1 of the Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled MOVES-PD Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Journal of Parkinson's disease. Key conclusion: Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Venglustat in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and a GBA Mutation: Results from Part 1 of the Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled MOVES-PD Trial.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

7. J Parkinsons Dis. 2022;12(2):557-570. doi: 10.3233/JPD-212714. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Oral Venglustat in Patients with Parkinson's Disease and a GBA Mutation: Results from Part 1 of the Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled MOVES-PD Trial. Peterschmitt MJ(1

08
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of hazardous materials (2026) PMID: 41650594 ↗
Chronic co-exposure to BPA and alcohol synergizes hepatotoxicity via dysregulation of glycerolipid metabolism and ceramide/HtrA2-driven apoptosis in HepG2 cells.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Clinical Study published in Journal of hazardous materials. Key conclusion: Crucially, in vitro oncogenic transformation assays identified the co-exposure as a tumor promoter rather than an initiator, significantly enhancing colony formation following 3-MCA initiation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Bisphenol A (BPA) and alcohol (ALC) are recognized hepatotoxicants to which humans are chronically exposed through environmental sources, dietary habits, and preferences for alcoholic beverages. However, there is currently a lack of conclusive evidence concerning the synergistic hepatotoxic effects associated with co-exposure. This study provides mechanistic insights into BPA and ALC co-exposure-induced subcellular changes mimicking hepatotoxicity using acute and chronic 2D models and 3D HepG2/LX-2 spheroids. Results demonstrated that co-exposure amplified oxidative stress, DNA damage, and apoptosis, while promoting lipid droplet accumulation, thereby manifesting synergistic hepatic lipotoxicity. These findings were corroborated in a physiologically relevant 3D HepG2/LX-2 co-culture spheroid model, where co-exposure induced significantly greater cytotoxicity than single-agent treatments. Mechanistically, chronic co-exposure specifically dysregulated LIPIN-mediated glycerolipid homeostasis by synergistically inducing the expression of LIPIN-2 and LIPIN-3. Furthermore, integrated transcriptomic and lipidomic analyses revealed that the ceramide metabolic pathway is uniquely involved in triggering high-temperature requirement A2 (HtrA2)-mediated apoptosis and oncogenic signaling under conditions of chronic co-exposure to BPA and ALC. Crucially, in vitro oncogenic transformation assays identified the co-exposure as a tumor promoter rather than an initiator, significantly enhancing colony formation following 3-MCA initiation. TIMER database analysis further associated aberrant HTRA2 expression with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and poor prognosis, which are potentially mediated through downregulation of the detoxification enzyme UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 2 member B10 (UGT2B10), a factor critical for normal liver cell function. Overall, this study establishes glycerolipid metabolism and HtrA2 as early biomarkers of synergistic hepatic injury and further hepatocarcinogenesis, highlighting critical implications for food safety and risk assessment of chemical-behavioral co-exposures.

09
CLINICAL STUDY Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology (2025) PMID: 40319715 ↗
Synergistic effects of oral milk ceramide-collagen peptides mixtures in preventing UV-induced inflammation and photoaging through TGF-β and NF-κB/MAPK signaling pathways in UV-exposed hairless mice.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in Journal of photochemistry and photobiology. B, Biology. Key conclusion: These results suggest that the 1:1 milk ceramide-collagen peptides mixture effectively prevents UV-induced skin damage and photoaging by enhancing collagen peptides production and improving skin barrier function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This study investigates the synergistic effects of oral milk ceramide-collagen peptides in inhibiting UV-induced inflammation and preventing photoaging. The optimal ratio of milk ceramide to collagen peptides was determined in HaCaT cells, and the effects of oral supplementation of milk ceramide-collagen peptides were evaluated in UV-exposed hairless mice. HaCaT cells did not exhibit cytotoxicity when treated with milk ceramide and collagen peptides at concentrations up to 200 μg/mL. UVB exposure decreased cell viability, but treatment with the milk ceramide-collagen peptides mixtures (1:1, 1:3) prevented further viability loss and improved collagen peptides synthesis markers, including MMPs and TIMPs. The combination also enhanced moisture-related factors (AQP3, FLG) and reduced inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β) and COX expression. In hairless mice, oral supplementation of milk ceramide-collagen peptides mixture (1:1 ratio) improved skin hydration, reduced erythema, TEWL, skin thickness, and wrinkle formation in a dose-dependent manner. The treatment also suppressed the expression of MMPs and TIMPs, promoting collagen peptides synthesis. Furthermore, the mixtures regulated NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways, reducing inflammation and photoaging. These results suggest that the 1:1 milk ceramide-collagen peptides mixture effectively prevents UV-induced skin damage and photoaging by enhancing collagen peptides production and improving skin barrier function.

10
CLINICAL STUDY British journal of clinical pharmacology (2025) PMID: 40066762 ↗
Drug-drug interaction study with itraconazole supplemented with physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling to characterize the effect of CYP3A inhibitors on venglustat pharmacokinetics.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in British journal of clinical pharmacology. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The effect of itraconazole on venglustat exposure was quantified clinically, and a minimal PBPK model was successfully developed, validated and applied to assess DDI effect of additional CYP3A inhibitors on venglustat.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

AIMS: Venglustat is an oral glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor under clinical investigation to treat various lysosomal storage diseases. Metabolism is a main pathway for its elimination in humans with CYP3A being the major contributor. This study aims to evaluate effect of CYP3A inhibition (using itraconazole) on venglustat exposure and to develop and validate a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to assess effects of additional CYP3A inhibitors of varying potencies on venglustat pharmacokinetics. METHODS: An open-label, single-sequence, 2-period drug-drug interaction (DDI) study was conducted in healthy subjects with coadministration of multiple twice daily oral doses of 100 mg itraconazole against a single dose of 15 mg venglustat. A minimal PBPK model was developed using available physicochemical, in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic data and validated using data from relevant venglustat clinical studies including the itraconazole DDI study. Effects of additional CYP3A inhibitors on venglustat exposure were predicted. RESULTS: Coadministration with itraconazole increased venglustat area under the concentration-time curve by 2.03-fold (90% confidence interval [90%CI]: 1.81-2.27). Venglustat steady-state area under the concentration-time curve during a dosing interval following coadministration with strong (clarithromycin), moderate (fluconazole) and weak (fluvoxamine and cimetidine; with CYP2D6 inhibition turned off) CYP3A inhibitors is predicted to increase by 1.74- (5th-95th centile, 1.30-2.49), 1.52- (1.23-1.88), 1.08- (1.03-1.15) and 1.08-fold (1.04-1.12), respectively. CONCLUSION: The effect of itraconazole on venglustat exposure was quantified clinically, and a minimal PBPK model was successfully developed, validated and applied to assess DDI effect of additional CYP3A inhibitors on venglustat. The results help to further understand the DDI potential with venglustat and will inform dose recommendations with comedications. © 2025 British Pharmacological Society.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category