NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

DHEA

MEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

DHEA is an evidence-graded men health monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 8,399 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 1 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (0 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 8,399
Reported Trial Dosages 50 mg/day · 1,000 IU/day · 6.5 mg
Trial Duration Range 2 months · 3 months · 26 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (50 mg/day · 1,000 IU/day · 6.5 mg) over a structured 2 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
inflammation (PubMed clinical endpoint)
fertility (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is DHEA & Why Does Form Matter?

DHEA is classified under MEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (50 mg/day, 1,000 IU/day, 6.5 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for DHEA frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, DHEA acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns DHEA an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 1 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (0 double-blind, n = 8,399 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41185971 (2025) — "The auxiliary effect of oral nutritional supplements on fertility in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSIONS: Oral nutritional supplements, including vitamins, coenzyme Q10, and DHEA may be a simple and relatively low-risk treatment option to assist in improving fertility in women with DOR.) • PMID:39682053 (2025) — "Efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenol administration as assessed by hormonal, glycolipid metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress parameters in patients with PCOS: a meta-analysis and systematic review." (None of the interventions significantly affected weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), homeostatic model-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting blood sugar (FBS), glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), dehydroepiandros) • PMID:39389530 (2024) — "Effect of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, and hormonal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome: An umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis." (The present meta-analysis revealed that vitamin D supplementation might significantly affect TG, TC, LDL-c, DHEA, and TT while it is not effective in improving BMI, HDL-c, and insulin.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 39682053-0.85 (-1.32–-0.38)PMID 373644270.16 (-1.32–0.37)PMID 35460091-24.9 (-41.72–-8.07)PMID 34342920-0.04 (-0.56–0.47)PMID 342466647.02 (5.43–8.62)PMID 399893284.13PMID 396178824.13-49Null (0)16Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 50 mg/day · 1,000 IU/day · 6.5 mg · 10 μg over 2 months · 3 months · 26 weeks · 4 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for DHEA, but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (50 mg/day · 1,000 IU/day · 6.5 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 2 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 22 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Annals of medicine (2025) PMID: 41185971 ↗
The auxiliary effect of oral nutritional supplements on fertility in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Annals of medicine involving n = 2,773 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (OR 1.7). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Oral nutritional supplements, including vitamins, coenzyme Q10, and DHEA may be a simple and relatively low-risk treatment option to assist in improving fertility in women with DOR.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the adjuvant effects of oral nutritional supplements including vitamins, coenzyme Q10, and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on fertility in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). METHODS: We conducted a generalized explore of 9 databases established as of September 1, 2024. Mainly studing and analyzing outcomes including serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, anti Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels, antral follicle count (AFC), retrieved oocytes, and clinical pregnancy rate with the methodology of a systematic review and meta-analysis. The inclusion quality of each experiment was evaluated through the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS). RESULTS: The meta-analysis consisted of 16 studies with 2773 participants. A review of existing evidence suggested that oral nutritional supplements, including vitamins, coenzyme Q10, and DHEA, could significantly lower FSH levels (SMD = -0.67, 95% CI [-0.94, -0.40], p < 0.0001), rise AMH levels (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.02, 0.69], p = 0.04), AFC counts (MD = 0.99, 95% CI [0.28, 1.69], p = 0.006), retrieved oocyte counts (MD = 0.88, 95% CI [0.54, 1.23], p < 0.0001), and clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = [1.35, 2.13], p < 0.0001). Oral nutritional supplements for more than 2 months have a better effect on lowering FSH levels, raising AMH levels, and oocyte numbers (p < 0.05). In addition, we found that the use of coenzyme Q10 alone was more effective than the use of DHEA alone through subgroup analysis. There was a remarkable correlation (p < 0.05) between the use of both nutritional supplements and the decrease of FSH, as well as the increase of AMH, AFC, and oocytes retrieved. We used sensitivity analysis to conclude that our summary results are robust. CONCLUSIONS: Oral nutritional supplements, including vitamins, coenzyme Q10, and DHEA may be a simple and relatively low-risk treatment option to assist in improving fertility in women with DOR. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024580831.

02
META-ANALYSIS Critical reviews in food science and nutrition (2025) PMID: 39682053 ↗
Efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenol administration as assessed by hormonal, glycolipid metabolism, inflammation and oxidative stress parameters in patients with PCOS: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition involving n = 934 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0 (MD -0.85). Key conclusion: None of the interventions significantly affected weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), homeostatic model-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting blood sugar (FBS), glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), dehydroepiandros
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The current knowledge about the efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenol administration in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is divergent. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pooled efficacy and safety of dietary polyphenol administration in the treatment of patients with PCOS. METHODS: The pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dietary polyphenol administration for the treatment of PCOS. English-language RCTs involving adults with PCOS were thoroughly searched in electronic databases from the time of their establishment to May 2024. Random-effects models were used because heterogeneity was derived from differences in intervention materials and study duration, among other confounding factors. The effect sizes of the outcomes in the pooled analysis are expressed as weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs involving 934 patients were finally included. Compared with control treatments, dietary polyphenol administration significantly reduced luteinizing hormone (LH) (WMD: -0.85, 95% CI [-1.32 to -0.38], p = 0.00), and prolactin levels (WMD: -3.73, 95% CI [-6.73 to -0.74], p = 0.01). Dietary polyphenol administration significantly reduced insulin levels (WMD: -0.85, 95% CI [-1.32 to -0.38], p = 0.00). Regarding lipid metabolism, dietary polyphenol administration only reduced triglyceride levels (WMD: -8.96, 95% CI [-16.44 to -1.49], p = 0.02). Malondialdehyde (MDA) (WMD: -0.65, 95% CI [-0.68 to -0.62], p = 0.00), tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) (WMD: -1.39, 95% CI [-2.41 to -0.37], p = 0.01) concentrations were significantly reduced by dietary polyphenol administration. None of the interventions significantly affected weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), homeostatic model-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), fasting blood sugar (FBS), glycated hemoglobin (HBA1c), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone (T), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), estradiol (E2), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), total antioxi

03
META-ANALYSIS Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators (2024) PMID: 39389530 ↗
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on lipid profile, and hormonal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome: An umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Prostaglandins & other lipid mediators; statistical significance reported at p = 0.02 (SMD -0.23). Key conclusion: The present meta-analysis revealed that vitamin D supplementation might significantly affect TG, TC, LDL-c, DHEA, and TT while it is not effective in improving BMI, HDL-c, and insulin.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Vitamin D has the potential to therapeutically affect the lipid profile and endocrine parameters of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients. However, results from prior studies have been inconsistent. Therefore, we conducted an umbrella meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to better understand the effectiveness of vitamin D in treating PCOS. We conducted an electronic search across multiple databases, including Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus, from their inception to January 2, 2024. Random-effects models were used to perform the umbrella meta-analysis. The analysis included 15 meta-analyses of RCTs. Vitamin D demonstrated a significant reduction in TG levels (SMD = -0.23; 95 % CI: -0.42, -0.04, p = 0.02, and WMD = -8.76, 95 % CI: -11.81, -5.72; p <0.001), TC (SMD = -0.47, 95 % CI: -0.80, -0.13; p = 0.007, and WMD = -8.89, 95 % CI: -13.18, -4.59; p < 0.001), LDL-c (SMD = -0.24, 95 % CI: -0.38, -0.10; p = 0.001, and WMD = -3.83, 95 % CI: -6.49, -1.16; p = 0.005), TT (SMD = -0.15, 95 % CI: -0.29 to -0.01; p = 0.02), and DHEA (WMD: -28.03; 95 % CI: -56.9 to -0.36; p = 0.04). However, no significant effect on HDL-c, insulin, and BMI. The present meta-analysis revealed that vitamin D supplementation might significantly affect TG, TC, LDL-c, DHEA, and TT while it is not effective in improving BMI, HDL-c, and insulin. Vitamin D showed noteworthy effects in preventing lipid profile and enhancing hormonal function in patients with PCOS.

04
META-ANALYSIS European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology (2023) PMID: 37364427 ↗
The effect of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on anthropometric indices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.274 (MD 0.16). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Administration of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate for more than 3 months results in a decrease in BMI, which helps to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: Little evidence exists on the effect of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on all the anthropometric indices. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials was conducted to give an evidence-based report on the effect of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on anthropometric indices. METHODS: The literature search was executed in databases including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar to recognize clinical trials that examined the influence of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate on obesity indices from database inception to Jan 2023. RESULTS: Combined findings were generated from 20 eligible articles. The meta-analysis showed that body weight (Weighted Mean Difference (WMD): -0.47 kg, 95% CI: -1.32, 0.37, p = 0.274), body fat (WMD: 0.16 kg, 95% CI: -1.26, 1.59, p = 0.821), WHR (WMD: 0.001 kg, 95% CI: -0.006, 1.15, p = 0.872), and LBM (WMD: -0.02 kg, 95% CI: -1.19, 1.15, p = 0.970) were not modified in DHEA group compared to the control, but BMI levels were significantly reduced in 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate group (WMD: -0.15 kg/m2, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.008, p = 0.039). Moreover, based on intervention duration (months), a more significant reduction in BMI was found in trials that were performed on studies with ˃3 months duration (WMD: -0.176 kg/m2) than studies with ≤ 3 months (WMD: 0.05 kg/m2). CONCLUSION: Administration of 17beta-estradiol plus norethisterone acetate for more than 3 months results in a decrease in BMI, which helps to reduce cardiovascular disease risk.

05
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in endocrinology (2023) PMID: 37361534 ↗
Efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone priming in women with poor ovarian response undergoing IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in endocrinology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.022 (RR 0.46). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: DHEA treatment didn't significantly improve the live birth rate of women with DOR or POR undergoing IVF/ICSI in the subgroup analysis of only RCTs.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) may improve the outcomes of patients with poor ovarian response (POR) or diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) undergoing IVF/ICSI. However, the evidence remains inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of DHEA supplementation in patients with POR/DOR undergoing IVF/ICSI. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched up to October 2022. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were retrieved, including 14 RCTs, 11 self-controlled studies and 7 case-controlled studies. In the subgroup analysis of only RCTs, DHEA treatment significantly increased the number of antral follicle count (AFC) (weighted mean difference : WMD 1.18, 95% confidence interval(CI): 0.17 to 2.19, P=0.022), while reduced the level of bFSH (WMD -1.99, 95% CI: -2.52 to -1.46, P<0.001), the need of gonadotropin (Gn) doses (WMD -382.29, 95% CI: -644.82 to -119.76, P=0.004), the days of stimulation (WMD -0.90, 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.47, P <0.001) and miscarriage rate (relative risk : RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.73, P=0.001). The higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were found in the analysis of non-RCTs. However, there were no significant differences in the number of retrieved oocytes, the number of transferred embryos, and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in the subgroup analysis of only RCTs. Moreover, meta-regression analyses showed that women with lower basal FSH had more increase in serum FSH levels (b=-0.94, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.25, P=0.014), and women with higher baseline AMH levels had more increase in serum AMH levels (b=-0.60, 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.06, P=0.035) after DHEA supplementation. In addition, the number of retrieved oocytes was higher in the studies on relatively younger women (b=-0.21, 95% CI: -0.39 to -0.03, P=0.023) and small sample sizes (b=-0.003, 95% CI: -0.006 to -0.0003, P=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: DHEA treatment didn't significantly improve the live birth rate of women with DOR or POR undergoing IVF/ICSI in the subgroup analysis of only RCTs. The higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in those non-RCTs should be interpreted with caution because o

06
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening (2023) PMID: 35996249 ↗
The Role of Dehydroepiandrosterone in Improving in vitro Fertilization Outcome in Patients with DOR/POR: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening involving n = 1,998 participants (RR 1.35). Key conclusion: On the basis of this limited evidence, we conclude that further studies are required to provide sufficient data.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although many trials have evaluated the use of dehydroepiandrosterone to improve outcomes in poor responders undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment, evidence supporting this approach is controversial. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing published data to further elucidate and supplement the use of Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) to improve the effectiveness of vitro fertilization in patients with diminished ovarian reserve or adverse ovarian reactions. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched through December 2020. Oocyte yield, metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, top-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were analyzed as relative outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed and fitted to both fixed-effects models and random-effects models. RESULTS: Eight prospective randomized controlled studies, five prospective case-control studies, and three retrospective cohort studies were conducted with a total of 1998 participants. Meta-analyses of these studies showed a significantly higher number of oocytes retrieved (WMD 1.09, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.80), metaphase II oocytes (WMD 0.78, 95% CI 0.16 to 1.40), fertilized oocytes (WMD 0.84, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.26), top-quality embryos (WMD 0.60, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.86), clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.61), and ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.46), although there was no difference in live birth rate (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.94) in the DHEA supplementation groups compared with that in the control groups. CONCLUSION: Oral DHEA supplementation appears to improve some IVF outcomes. On the basis of this limited evidence, we conclude that further studies are required to provide sufficient data.

07
META-ANALYSIS The International journal of eating disorders (2022) PMID: 35460091 ↗
Dehydroepiandrosterone status and efficacy of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation for bone health in anorexia nervosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in The International journal of eating disorders (MD -24.9). Key conclusion: While the combination of DHEA and conjugated oral contraceptives has led to increased bone strength and decreased bone loss, the beneficial effect appears to be limited to older adolescents and adults with closed physes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the status of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in women with anorexia nervosa (AN) and to assess the efficacy of DHEA supplementation as a treatment for bone health in women with AN. METHOD: Studies were retrieved from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from inception to February 14, 2022. Observational studies that compared serum DHEA levels between women with AN and healthy controls were included for meta-analysis, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of DHEA supplementation on bone mass were reviewed. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 15 cross-sectional studies revealed that patients with AN had significantly elevated serum DHEA levels (mean difference (MD) = 311.63 ng/dl; 95% confidence interval (CI), 78.01-545.25) and reduced DHEAS levels (MD = -24.90 μg/dl; 95% CI, -41.72 to -8.07) compared with healthy controls. A systematic review of seven RCTs found that DHEA monotherapy does not improve bone mineral density (BMD) compared with placebo after adjusting for weight gain. While the combination of DHEA and conjugated oral contraceptives has led to increased bone strength and decreased bone loss, the beneficial effect appears to be limited to older adolescents and adults with closed physes. Potential detrimental effects on BMD were identified in younger adolescents with open physes in one study. DISCUSSION: Due to the lack of apparent benefit of DHEA in women with AN and its potential detrimental effect on BMD in young patients with AN, current evidence does not support the use of DHEA. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that women with anorexia nervosa have abnormal levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), which have been suggested by previous studies to play a role in the development of low bone density in this condition. However, current evidence does not support the use of DHEA as a treatment to preserve bone health in patients with anorexia nervosa given the lack of clear benefit following its use and also because of a potential detrimental effect on bone mineral density in young patients with anorexia n

08
META-ANALYSIS International journal of clinical practice (2021) PMID: 34342920 ↗
Effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on cortisol, leptin, adiponectin, and liver enzyme levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in International journal of clinical practice; statistical significance reported at p = 0.002 (MD -0.045). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: DHEA supplementation decreased circulating cortisol but did not alter adiponectin, leptin, AST, and ALT levels.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation has been investigated in patients with altered cortisol levels and is proposed to ameliorate the metabolic profile related to adipose tissue. However, further research is warranted and evidence is no compelling for liver safety. Hence, we aimed to meta-analyse the effects of DHEA supplementation on circulating levels of cortisol, liver enzymes, and adipokines. METHODS: We searched literature published in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus, until December 2020. We obtained overall results using the generic inverse of variance method with a random-effects model. RESULTS: Through 10 arms, serum cortisol levels decreased significantly after DHEA supplementation [weighted mean difference (WMD): -53.581 nmol/L, 95% confidence interval (CI): -88.2, -18.9, P = .002], without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 36%, P = .117). In contrast, any significance was noted for adiponectin (WMD: -0.045 µg/mL, 95% CI: -0.56, 0.47; P = .865), leptin (WMD: -2.55 µg/mL, 95% CI: -6.2, 1.06; P = .166), aspartate transaminase (AST) (WMD: -3.7 U/L, 95% CI: -10.35, 2.95; P = .276), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (WMD: -1.7 U/L, 95% CI: -3.45, 0.06; P = .058). CONCLUSION: DHEA supplementation decreased circulating cortisol but did not alter adiponectin, leptin, AST, and ALT levels. Hence, DHEA supplementation could be considered as an adjunct in the management of hypercortisolaemia and is safe for the liver. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

09
META-ANALYSIS Steroids (2021) PMID: 34246664 ↗
The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on estradiol levels in women: A dose-response and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Steroids involving n = 1,223 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0 (MD 7.02). Key conclusion: Moreover, estradiol levels increased significantly with DHEA dosages of 50 mg/day (WMD: 7.75 pg/mL, 95% CI: 9.12, 9.39, I2 = 94%) and when DHEA was prescribed to postmenopausal women (WMD: 7.61 pg/mL, 95% CI: 5.97, 9.24, I2 = 93%).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Estradiol, an estrogen steroid hormone, serves as the dominant female hormone and its levels fluctuate during lifetime. In women, after the menopause, all estrogens and almost all androgens are locally developed in the peripheral tissues from dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). However, the effect of DHEA supplementation on estradiol levels in women is unclear as previously published data has resulted in conflicting findings. Thus, we conducted the present dose-response meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the influence of DHEA on estradiol concentrations in women. The PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus databases were systematically searched for articles published on this topic until May 10, 2021. No time or language restrictions were applied. The data were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), and a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The pooled results were obtained using the generic inverse of variance method with a random effects model. A total of 21 arms, including 1223 participants (case = 610, and control = 613), reported estradiol concentrations as an outcome measure. The overall results demonstrated that estradiol significantly increased following the administration of DHEA (WMD: 7.02 pg/mL, 95% CI: 5.43, 8.62, P = 0.000). The stratified analyses revealed that the elevation of estradiol concentrations was more pronounced in subjects aged ≥60 years old (WMD: 8.56 pg/mL, 95% CI: 6.97, 10.16, I2 = 94%) and in those receiving DHEA supplements for ≥26 weeks (WMD: 7.30 pg/mL, 95% CI: 6.28, 8.32, I2 = 61%). Moreover, estradiol levels increased significantly with DHEA dosages of 50 mg/day (WMD: 7.75 pg/mL, 95% CI: 9.12, 9.39, I2 = 94%) and when DHEA was prescribed to postmenopausal women (WMD: 7.61 pg/mL, 95% CI: 5.97, 9.24, I2 = 93%). This meta-analysis has provided a comprehensive overview of the effects of DHEA administration on circulating estradiol levels, far beyond the available evidence from different RCTs. Subsequent subgroup analyses revealed that postmenopausal women, females aged 60 years and above, those on DHEA dosages of 50 mg/day

10
META-ANALYSIS Annals of palliative medicine (2021) PMID: 33545754 ↗
Vitamin D improves levels of hormonal, oxidative stress and inflammatory parameters in polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Annals of palliative medicine involving n = 1,060 participants. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that vitamin D supplementation in patients with PCOS resulted in an improvement in the levels of TT, hs-CRP, TAC, and MDA, but did not affect FT,
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Hyperandrogenism (HA), inflammation, and oxidative damage play key roles in the pathophysiology of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Whether vitamin D adjuvant therapy improves hormonal, inflammation, and oxidative damage in PCOS patients has aroused widespread interest, but the results are controversial. To evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on hormonal, oxidative stress, and inflammatory parameters in patients with PCOS. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in Medline, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science for studies related to PCOS and vitamin D supplementation. All reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before December 2019 were identified. The fixed-effects model or random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates of standardized differences in means (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A total of 956 identified studies were retrieved, and eighteen RCTs involving 1,060 participants were ultimately included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation in patients with PCOS resulted in a significant improvement in serum total testosterone (TT), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), and malondialdehyde (MDA). No significant effect on free testosterone (FT), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), free androgen index (FAI), nitric oxide (NO), and total glutathione (GSH) levels was found. Subgroup analysis showed that vitamin D supplementation reduced hs-CRP and MDA irrespective of the treatment course, type of vitamin D intervention, supplementation frequency, and dosage. Twelve weeks of vitamin D supplementation improved TT and TAC while low-dose vitamin D supplementation (≤1,000 IU/day) improved TT and DHEA-S. Vitamin D co-supplementation reduced TT, FT, and DHEA-S, while a daily supplementation regime improved TT, DHEA-S, and TAC in patients with PCOS. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis demonstrates that vitamin D supplementation in patients with PCOS resulted in an improvement in the levels of TT, hs-CRP, TAC, and MDA, but did not affect FT,

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category