NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Lycopene (Prostate)

MEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Lycopene (Prostate) is an evidence-graded men health monograph evaluated across 22 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (3 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 0 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 190,400 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 22 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 3 Meta · 5 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 0 RCTs (0 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 190,400
Reported Trial Dosages 2000 mg/day · 4.9 mg/day · 1.35 mg
Trial Duration Range 2 weeks
Reading Time ~11 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 22 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (2000 mg/day · 4.9 mg/day · 1.35 mg) over a structured 2 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary men health clinical efficacy (22 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (5 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (0 RCTs · 0 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (3 meta-analyses · 5 reviews)
01

What Is Lycopene (Prostate) & Why Does Form Matter?

Lycopene (Prostate) is classified under MEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 22 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (2000 mg/day, 4.9 mg/day, 1.35 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Lycopene (Prostate) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (0 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Lycopene (Prostate) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Lycopene (Prostate) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 22 PubMed studies: 3 meta-analyses, 5 systematic reviews, and 0 randomized controlled trials (0 double-blind, n = 190,400 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:35031434 (2022) — "The effect of lycopene supplement from different sources on prostate specific antigen (PSA): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (CONCLUSION: Overall, tomato extracts or lycopene treatment yielded no significant effect on PSA level compared to the control.) • PMID:33355018 (2021) — "Lycopene Does Not Affect Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men with Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials." (Although lycopene supplementation did not produce any reduction in PSA levels overall, a significant reducing effect was observed in patients with higher levels of baseline PSA.) • PMID:15142129 (2004) — "Diet, anthropometric measures and prostate cancer risk: a review of prospective cohort and intervention studies." (Studies are inconclusive on the role of meat, dairy products, fat, vegetables, fruits, alcohol and anthropometric measures, whereas a very high calcium intake appears to be positively associated with prostate cancer risk.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)MD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 35031434-0.12 (-0.62–0.38)PMID 33355018-0.6 (-2.01–0.81)-2.4Null (0)1.2Metric: MD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 2000 mg/day · 4.9 mg/day · 1.35 mg · 27.8 mg over 2 weeks. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Lycopene (Prostate), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (2000 mg/day · 4.9 mg/day · 1.35 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 2 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (22 Studies) · 5 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Complementary therapies in medicine (2022) PMID: 35031434 ↗
The effect of lycopene supplement from different sources on prostate specific antigen (PSA): A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Meta-Analysis published in Complementary therapies in medicine; statistical significance reported at p = 0.64 (MD -0.12). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Overall, tomato extracts or lycopene treatment yielded no significant effect on PSA level compared to the control.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a major malignancy, affecting men, worldwide. The protective effect of dietary or supplemental lycopene on prostate cancer has been reported in several studies; however, the findings are equivocal. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of supplemental lycopene on PSA level, by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. METHODS: We searched online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to 9 Jun 2020, to obtain relevant publications. The publication search was not limited by language or date. RESULTS: A total of 1036 records were identified in the systematic search; from these, 9 were included in the systematic review and 6 in meta-analysis. The pooled analysis of the 6 studies showed no significant differences in PSA levels in subjects treated with lycopene or tomato extract containing lycopene (WMD= -0.12 ng/ml; 95% CI: -0.62, 0.38 ng/ml; P = 0.64) compared to the control. CONCLUSION: Overall, tomato extracts or lycopene treatment yielded no significant effect on PSA level compared to the control. However, more consistent clinical trials, with larger sample sizes, are required to better discern the actual effect of tomato extract or lycopene on PSA level.

02
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition and cancer (2021) PMID: 33355018 ↗
Lycopene Does Not Affect Prostate-Specific Antigen in Men with Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2021 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition and cancer; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD -0.6). Key conclusion: Although lycopene supplementation did not produce any reduction in PSA levels overall, a significant reducing effect was observed in patients with higher levels of baseline PSA.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Comment in Nutr Cancer. 2022;74(3):806-807. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2021.2022724. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the effect of lycopene supplementation on serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in patients with prostate cancer. However, results have been inconclusive. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus up to January 2020 to find RCTs investigating the effect of lycopene supplementation on serum levels of PSA in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer. Using a random-effects model, the reported risk estimates were pooled. A total of six trials were included in the final analysis. we found no significant effect of lycopene on circulating PSA (WMD: -0.60, 95% CI: -2.01, 0.81 µg/L). However, we observed a significant reducing effect when the analysis was confined to studies that included patients with higher baseline levels of PSA (≥6.5 µg/L) (WMD: -3.74 µg/L, 95% CI: -5.15, -2.32, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis based on the duration of intervention did not result in any significant effect. Non-linear dose-response analysis did not show any significant effects of lycopene dosage (Pnon-linearity = 0.50) and duration of the intervention (Pnon-linearity = 0.63) on serum levels of PSA. Although lycopene supplementation did not produce any reduction in PSA levels overall, a significant reducing effect was observed in patients with higher levels of baseline PSA. Due to the heterogeneity of our results, further high-quality clinical trials with long-term duration are required to determine the efficacy of lycopene in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer.

03
CLINICAL STUDY BJU international (2004) PMID: 15142129 ↗
Diet, anthropometric measures and prostate cancer risk: a review of prospective cohort and intervention studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2004 Clinical Study published in BJU international. Key conclusion: Studies are inconclusive on the role of meat, dairy products, fat, vegetables, fruits, alcohol and anthropometric measures, whereas a very high calcium intake appears to be positively associated with prostate cancer risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

We reviewed 37 prospective cohort and four intervention studies on potential dietary risk factors for prostate cancer, published between 1966 and September 2003. Some studies were limited by small size, crude measurement of dietary exposure and limited control for confounders. Intervention and prospective cohort studies support a protective role against prostate cancer for selenium, and possibly for vitamin E, pulses and tomatoes/lycopene. Overall consumption of meat, eggs, vegetables, fruit, coffee, tea, carotenoids and vitamins A, C and D was not consistently related to prostate cancer risk. Intervention studies also indicate that supplementation with beta-carotene does not lower prostate cancer risk, except possibly in men with low beta-carotene status at baseline. For specific types of meat, alcoholic drinks, dairy products, fat and anthropometric measures, most cohort studies suggest either an increased risk or no relation with prostate cancer. For calcium, two cohort studies suggest an increased risk at very high calcium intakes (>2000 mg/day). In conclusion, prospective studies are consistent with a protective role for selenium, and possibly vitamin E, pulses and tomatoes/lycopene, in the aetiology of prostate cancer. Studies are inconclusive on the role of meat, dairy products, fat, vegetables, fruits, alcohol and anthropometric measures, whereas a very high calcium intake appears to be positively associated with prostate cancer risk.

04
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of cancer (1997) PMID: 9209014 ↗
Diet, nutrition and prostate cancer.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 1997 Clinical Study published in International journal of cancer. Key conclusion: To explore these aspects further will require large prospective studies that include improved (repeated) dietary measurements and also blood sampling, so that genetic polymorphisms can be adequately investigated.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Although much has been written, little is known about the causes of prostate cancer. Variations between populations in the incidence of invasive cancers, together with changes in the incidence of invasive cancers in migrants, have pointed to environmental (lifestyle) factors that might be amenable to intervention. Conversely, there is a lack of international variation in the prevalence of microscopic tumours, so the essential question is: what causes only some of the common microscopic tumours to become aggressive? Dietary factors hold the most promise in this regard and have been the subject of recent reviews. The strongest and most consistent effects are positive associations with animal products such as red meats, eggs and dairy foods, and possibly by implication, fat. Evidence of a protective effect of fruit and vegetables is weak and inconsistent, as is the relationship with vitamin A and carotenoids, such as beta-carotene. There are some interesting leads. Lycopene, the carotenoid found in tomatoes, has been reported to be protective; alpha-tocopherol supplementation has shown a protective effect in one intervention study; and vitamin D has been shown to be protective in a prospective study. Interest is also growing in phytoestrogens and the extent to which dietary manipulation with these and other phytochemicals might influence prostate cancer by modifying male sex hormone levels or actions. There is limited evidence of associations with obesity. It is not known whether these are related to a particular dietary pattern or to possible physiological effects on the male's hormonal milieu. Associations with lean body mass are likely to be related to the action of androgens during growth and development. Dietary and nutritional effects on prostate cancer do not appear to be strong, but they may be subtle and attenuated by measurement error. To explore these aspects further will require large prospective studies that include improved (repeated) dietary measurements and also blood sampling, so that genetic polymorphisms can be adequately investigated. Such studies are underway.

05
CLINICAL STUDY BMC medicine (2025) PMID: 41214650 ↗
Lycopene intake and prostate cancer risk in men at high cardiovascular risk: a prospective cohort study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Clinical Study published in BMC medicine involving n = 2,970 participants (HR 0.46). Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Higher lycopene intake suggested a protective association with a lower incidence of prostate cancer in men at high cardiovascular risk.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Intake of lycopene has been proposed as a protective dietary factor against prostate cancer development. Cardiovascular disease and prostate cancer share risk factors, which may modulate the effect of lycopene in high-risk individuals. This study aimed to examine the association between lycopene intake and prostate cancer risk in a Mediterranean population at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: A prospective cohort analysis was conducted among 2970 men aged 55-80 years at high cardiovascular risk from the PREDIMED trial, a multicenter study in Spain. Lycopene intake was assessed using repeated food frequency questionnaires. Prostate cancer cases were identified through medical records and death certificates. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) across lycopene intake quartiles. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 5.8 years, 104 prostate cancer cases were identified. Participants in the highest quartile of lycopene intake had a significantly lower risk of prostate cancer than those in the lowest quartile (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.23-0.95; p-trend = 0.035). A nonlinear dose-response relationship was observed, with a significant inverse association emerging at intakes above 4.9 mg/day (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.13-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Higher lycopene intake suggested a protective association with a lower incidence of prostate cancer in men at high cardiovascular risk. These findings support the role of lycopene-rich diets in prostate cancer prevention, which may be particularly relevant for high cardiovascular risk populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN35739639 (PREDIMED trial). © 2025. The Author(s).

06
CLINICAL STUDY Biochemical and biophysical research communications (2022) PMID: 35533600 ↗
Lycopene enhances the sensitivity of castration-resistant prostate cancer to enzalutamide through the AKT/EZH2/ androgen receptor signaling pathway.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2022 Clinical Study published in Biochemical and biophysical research communications. Key conclusion: These results suggest that the enhanced antitumor effects of enzalutamide by lycopene may be related to the reduction of AR protein levels through lycopene-mediated inhibition of AKT/EZH2 pathway, which may provide a new approach to improve the efficacy of enzalutamide in CRPC.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Enzalutamide is an effective drug for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but acquired enzalutamide resistance is usually unavoidable within the short term in many patients. Lycopene, a safe and effective phytochemical, has been documented to have anticancer activity in a variety of tumors, especially for prostate cancer (PCa). The aim of this study was to provide data support for the combination of lycopene and enzalutamide in the treatment of CRPC. To this end, tissues from patients with primary prostate cancer (PPC) and CRPC were examined by immunohistochemical analysis and found that p-AKT and p-EZH2 were overexpressed in CRPC. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the high expression of p-AKT and p-EZH2 may be related to the poor prognosis of patients. In addition, the expression of p-AKT, p-EZH2 and androgen receptor (AR) were significantly down-regulated in 22RV1 and C4-2B cells and the proliferation and invasion of CRPC cells were inhibited after treatment with lycopene, while SC79 (an AKT agonist) markedly rescue this effect. Of note, a combination of lycopene and enzalutamide significantly inhibited the proliferation and invasion of CRPC cells in vitro, as well as tumor growth and bone metastasis in vivo. These results suggest that the enhanced antitumor effects of enzalutamide by lycopene may be related to the reduction of AR protein levels through lycopene-mediated inhibition of AKT/EZH2 pathway, which may provide a new approach to improve the efficacy of enzalutamide in CRPC.

07
CLINICAL STUDY Archives of biochemistry and biophysics (2015) PMID: 25711533 ↗
The anti-cancer effects of carotenoids and other phytonutrients resides in their combined activity.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2015 Clinical Study published in Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. Key conclusion: Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is strongly associated with reduced risk of developing chronic diseases, such as cancer.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Epidemiological studies have consistently shown that regular consumption of fruits and vegetables is strongly associated with reduced risk of developing chronic diseases, such as cancer. It is now accepted that the actions of any specific phytonutrient alone do not explain the observed health benefits of diets rich in fruits and vegetables as nutrients that were taken alone in clinical trials did not show consistent preventive effects. The considerable cost and complexity of such clinical trials requires prudent selection of combinations of ingredients rather than single compounds. Indeed, synergistic inhibition of prostate and mammary cancer cell growth was evident when using combinations of low concentrations of various carotenoids or carotenoids with retinoic acid and the active metabolite of vitamin-D. In this study we aimed to develop simple and sensitive in vitro methods which provide information on potent combinations suitable for inclusion in clinical studies for cancer prevention. We, thus, used reporter gene assays of the transcriptional activity of the androgen receptor in hormone-dependent prostate cancer cells and of the electrophile/antioxidant response element (EpRE/ARE) transcription system. We found that combinations of several carotenoids (e.g., lycopene, phytoene and phytofluene), or carotenoids and polyphenols (e.g., carnosic acid and curcumin) and/or other compounds (e.g., vitamin E) synergistically inhibit the androgen receptor activity and activate the EpRE/ARE system. The activation of EpRE/ARE was up to four fold higher than the sum of the activities of the single ingredients, a robust hallmark of synergy. Such combinations can further be tested in the more complex in vivo models and human studies.

08
CLINICAL STUDY The Journal of nutritional biochemistry (2012) PMID: 22137263 ↗
Lycopene and the LXRα agonist T0901317 synergistically inhibit the proliferation of androgen-independent prostate cancer cells via the PPARγ-LXRα-ABCA1 pathway.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2012 Clinical Study published in The Journal of nutritional biochemistry. Key conclusion: Liver X receptor α knockdown by siRNA against LXRα significantly promoted the proliferation of DU145 cells, whereas si-LXRα knockdown followed by incubation with lycopene (10 μM) restored the proliferation to the control level.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

In our previous study, we demonstrated that lycopene can inhibit the proliferation of androgen-dependent prostate LNCaP cancer cells through the activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ)-liver X receptor alpha (LXRα)-ATP-binding cassette transporter 1 (ABCA1) pathway. However, it is still unclear whether lycopene possesses similar effects in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells DU145 and PC-3. As lycopene inhibited the proliferation of both cell types to a similar extent, we chose DU145 cells for most of the subsequent studies. We show that lycopene significantly increased protein and mRNA expression of PPARγ, LXRα and ABCA1 and cholesterol efflux (i.e., decreased cellular cholesterol and increased cholesterol in culture medium). Lycopene (10 μM) in the presence of a specific antagonist of PPARγ (GW9662) or of LXRα (GGPP) restored the proliferation of DU145 cells and significantly suppressed lycopene-induced protein and mRNA expression of PPARγ and LXRα and cholesterol efflux. Liver X receptor α knockdown by siRNA against LXRα significantly promoted the proliferation of DU145 cells, whereas si-LXRα knockdown followed by incubation with lycopene (10 μM) restored the proliferation to the control level. Furthermore, lycopene in combination with the LXRα agonist T0901317 exhibited synergistic effects on cell proliferation and protein expression of PPARγ, LXRα and ABCA1. These results demonstrate that lycopene can inhibit DU145 cell proliferation via PPARγ-LXRα-ABCA1 pathway and that lycopene and T0901317 exhibit synergistic effects. Crown Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

09
CLINICAL STUDY International journal of antimicrobial agents (2008) PMID: 17920247 ↗
Synergistic effect between lycopene and ciprofloxacin on a chronic bacterial prostatitis rat model.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2008 Clinical Study published in International journal of antimicrobial agents. Key conclusion: The lycopene/ciprofloxacin group also showed a statistically significant decrease in bacterial growth and improvement in prostatic inflammation compared with the ciprofloxacin group.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Traditionally, long-term antibiotic therapy has been the gold standard treatment for chronic bacterial prostatitis (CBP). However, the treatment outcome is not ideal and long-term administration of antibiotics can result in adverse effects and bacterial resistance. For these reasons, both patients and physicians are dissatisfied with the management of this disease and there is interest in phytotherapy and other alternative therapies. Lycopene, an extract of tomatoes, has been reported to have an anti-inflammatory effect via an antioxidative function. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of lycopene on CBP, we developed a CBP rat model treated with ciprofloxacin or lycopene, or both. After 2 weeks of treatment, results of microbiological cultures of the prostate and urine as well as histological findings of the prostate were analysed. The ciprofloxacin group and the lycopene/ciprofloxacin group showed a statistically significant decrease in bacterial growth and improvement in prostatic inflammation compared with the control group. The lycopene/ciprofloxacin group also showed a statistically significant decrease in bacterial growth and improvement in prostatic inflammation compared with the ciprofloxacin group. These results suggest that lycopene may have an additional (synergistic) effect with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of CBP.

10
CLINICAL STUDY Clinical journal of oncology nursing (2005) PMID: 15853167 ↗
Complementary and alternative medicine patients are talking about: lycopene.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2005 Clinical Study published in Clinical journal of oncology nursing. Key conclusion: [email protected] DOI: 10.1188/05.CJON.245-246 PMID: 15853167 [Indexed for MEDLINE]
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

154. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2005 Apr;9(2):245-6. doi: 10.1188/05.CJON.245-246. Complementary and alternative medicine patients are talking about: lycopene. Lee CO(1). Author information: (1)Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine at the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, MD, USA. [email protected] DOI: 10.1188/05.CJON.245-246 PMID: 15853167 [Indexed for MEDLINE]

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category