NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

L-Arginine (ED)

MEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

L-Arginine (ED) is an evidence-graded men health monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 4,073 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 9 Meta · 0 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 8 RCTs (5 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 4,073
Reported Trial Dosages 5,000 mg · 10 mg · 20 mg
Trial Duration Range 23 weeks · 7 days · 6 days
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (5,000 mg · 10 mg · 20 mg) over a structured 23 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary men health clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (17 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (8 RCTs · 5 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (9 meta-analyses · 0 reviews)
01

What Is L-Arginine (ED) & Why Does Form Matter?

L-Arginine (ED) is classified under MEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (5,000 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for L-Arginine (ED) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (8 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, L-Arginine (ED) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns L-Arginine (ED) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 9 meta-analyses, 0 systematic reviews, and 8 randomized controlled trials (5 double-blind, n = 4,073 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:40789388 (2025) — "Does l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake reduce blood pressure in middle-aged and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials." (These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).) • PMID:39796467 (2024) — "Effects of Different Dietary Supplements on Swimming Performance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis." (Creatine_NaHCO3 was distinguished as the optimal approach for improving blood pH.) • PMID:39279185 (2024) — "Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis." (On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 39796467-1.66 (-2.92–-0.44)PMID 305775590.59-3.4Null (0)1.1Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 5,000 mg · 10 mg · 20 mg · 6 g over 23 weeks · 7 days · 6 days · 12 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for L-Arginine (ED), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (5,000 mg · 10 mg · 20 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 23 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 17 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Clinical nutrition ESPEN (2025) PMID: 40789388 ↗
Does l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake reduce blood pressure in middle-aged and older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical nutrition ESPEN involving n = 415 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.002. Key conclusion: These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the effects of l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake on blood pressure (BP) in middle-aged and elderly individuals. METHODS: Data analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software, employing a random effects model to statistically analyze the pooled effect sizes of the obtained systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) data. Results are reported as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI). RESULTS: A total of 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake on BP in middle-aged and elderly individuals were included, comprising 24 datasets involving 415 participants. The results indicate that l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake significantly reduced SBP (-4.02 mmHg [95 % CI: -6.54 to -1.50], P = 0.002) and DBP (-2.54 mmHg [95 % CI: -4.27 to -0.81], P = 0.004) in the elderly. Subgroup analysis showed that the combined supplementation of l-citrulline and l-arginine significantly decreased SBP (-10.44 mmHg [95 % CI: -13.57 to -7.31], P < 0.00001) and DBP (-4.86 mmHg [95 % CI: -7.93 to -1.79], P = 0.002) in this population. CONCLUSION: l-citrulline supplementation and watermelon intake overall lowered BP in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Subgroup analysis indicates that the combined supplementation of l-citrulline and l-arginine is superior to l-citrulline or watermelon supplementation alone. These findings provide new dietary recommendations for BP management in the elderly, suggesting that dietary interventions can effectively improve cardiovascular health and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

02
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2024) PMID: 39796467 ↗
Effects of Different Dietary Supplements on Swimming Performance: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients (SMD -1.66). Key conclusion: Creatine_NaHCO3 was distinguished as the optimal approach for improving blood pH.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Nutritional supplements are widely used by swimmers, but the effectiveness of various supplements and the identification of the most effective intervention require further investigation. PURPOSE: This paper evaluated and compared the effectiveness of various nutrition-based interventions on swimming performance through both direct and indirect comparisons. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and SPORTDiscus databases were thoroughly searched up to 4 April 2024. The risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A random-effect model was adopted to compute standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: L-arginine (Arg) demonstrated superior performance to the placebo (SMD = -1.66, 95% CI [-2.92, -0.44]), emerging as the most effective intervention for reducing 100 swimming time (SUCRA = 89.5%). Beta-alanine (BA) was the best intervention for improving blood lactate (SUCRA = 80%). Creatine combined with sodium bicarbonate (Creatine_NaHCO3) significantly increased blood pH compared to the placebo (SMD = 3.79, 95% CI [1.85, 5.80]), with a SUCRA score of 99.9%, suggesting it is the most effective intervention for this parameter. No prominent differences were noted among the interventions in 50 m time, 200 m time, heart rate, and body mass. CONCLUSIONS: Dietary supplements might provide benefits for improving swimming performance. Arg emerged as the most efficacious modality for reducing 100 m time. BA proved to be the preeminent strategy for decreasing blood lactate. Creatine_NaHCO3 was distinguished as the optimal approach for improving blood pH.

03
META-ANALYSIS The journal of sexual medicine (2024) PMID: 39279185 ↗
Nutraceutical interventions for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of sexual medicine involving n = 1,000 participants. Key conclusion: On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Although nutraceutical-based treatments are often offered for erectile dysfunction (ED), their efficacy remains doubtful, and the choice of one substance over the other is challenged by the dearth of head-to-head comparative studies. AIM: We aimed to compare the efficacy of available nutraceutical interventions, alone or in combination with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), in improving erectile function in men with ED through a network meta-analysis (NMA), which incorporates direct and indirect evidence into one model thus generating a hierarchy of effectiveness. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of any nutraceutical regimen in improving erectile function when compared to each other, placebo, and/or PDE5i in men with ED. Data were included in a random-effects NMA, where efficacy of treatments was ranked by surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Two NMAs were also conducted separately for organic and non-organic ED. Reciprocal comparisons between all treatments were analyzed by league tables. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was the standardized mean difference in the score of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 or IIEF-6. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs provided information on 1000 men with ED. In the overall NMA, compared to placebo, the combination propionyl L-carnitine (PLC) + acetyl L-carnitine (ALC) + Sildenafil was associated with the highest SUCRA (97%) in improving erectile function score, followed by L-Arginine + Tadalafil (84%), Sildenafil (79%), Tadalafil (72%), and L-Arginine (52%). No other treatment regimen showed efficacy with statistical significance. In patients with organic ED, the efficacy of Sildenafil and Tadalafil was significantly improved by PLC + ALC and L-Arginine, respectively. On the contrary, in non-organic ED, nutraceuticals did not improve the therapeutic performance of daily Tadalafil. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This NMA contributes valuable insights into the potential of nutraceutical interventions for ED. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: We employed strict inclusion criteria relat

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2023) PMID: 37686709 ↗
Dietary Supplements for Erectile Dysfunction: Analysis of Marketed Products, Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Rational Use.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients. Key conclusion: A metanalysis identified some nutraceuticals, such as Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris and L-arginine, that are able to improve male sexual function.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The use of nutraceutical products to enhance male sexual performance has a long history, especially with regard to the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Alternative treatments for ED are becoming increasingly popular, with growing interest from consumers, as well as increased revenue for manufacturers. Dietary supplements (DSs), which are a mixture of active ingredients, are mainly sold online. In randomized controlled trials, the molecules contained in DSs have demonstrated varying degrees of effectiveness, or even have no evidence to support their use. However, none of the studies carried out provided sufficient evidence to consider these products a first-line therapy. Therefore, the combination of the various active ingredients, especially in relation to the daily dose, leaves doubts about the real effectiveness. In order to evaluate the potential efficacy of DS formulations, we analyzed the products marketed in Italy using a scoring approach. A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate the effect of DS and to detect the active ingredients able to improve erectile function-called effective ingredients (EIs)-and their minimal effective daily dose (mED). A metanalysis identified some nutraceuticals, such as Panax ginseng, Tribulus terrestris and L-arginine, that are able to improve male sexual function. Based on the scoring system, 2 (8%) supplements matched with the cluster of higher expected efficacy, 3 (12%) with the lower efficacy cluster and 20 (80%) matched with the criterion of no expected efficacy. DSs marketed in Italy are usually blends of many substances that are frequently employed at a negligible dose or without any evidence.

05
META-ANALYSIS Diabetes research and clinical practice (2023) PMID: 37369281 ↗
Watermelon consumption decreases risk factors of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2023 Meta-Analysis published in Diabetes research and clinical practice. Key conclusion: However, there was not any significant difference in other outcomes of interest including diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), BMI, body fat, and serum levels of arginine, insulin, and CRP after watermelon supplementation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

This meta-analysis was conducted to examine the effects of watermelon supplementation on cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk factors in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The comprehensive search was done in Cochrane Library databases, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus up to March 2022. A random-effect model was used for computing weighted mean differences (WMD). Standard methods were applied to examine publication bias, sensitivity analysis, and heterogeneity. Of the 8962 identified studies, 9 RCTs were included in the final analysis. Watermelon consumption significantly decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP), totalcholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). In addition, watermelon consumption led to a significant increase in fasting blood sugar (FBS). However, there was not any significant difference in other outcomes of interest including diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate (HR), BMI, body fat, and serum levels of arginine, insulin, and CRP after watermelon supplementation. The current findings provide promising evidence of the antihypertensive effect of watermelon. However, due to the lack of evidence in human research, the result regarding the remaining outcomes needs to be used with caution. Furter RCTs with longer follow-ups and larger sample sizes should be done to confirm the current findings.

06
META-ANALYSIS The journal of sexual medicine (2019) PMID: 30770070 ↗
The Potential Role of Arginine Supplements on Erectile Dysfunction: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2019 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of sexual medicine involving n = 540 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.01. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy and safety of arginine supplements in erectile dysfunction (ED) remain debatable. AIM: To assess the potential role of arginine supplements on ED as alternatives to phosphodiesterase inhibitors. METHODS: Studies published up to April 2018 that evaluated the efficacy of arginine supplements were identified from multiple databases (Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, Embase, Kiss, DBpia, and Cochrane databases). Studies comparing arginine supplements with placebo or no treatment; focusing only on patients with mild to moderate severity of ED; and presenting outcomes such as improvement rate, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score, and adverse effects were included. Subgroup analysis for arginine alone and arginine in combination with other substances was further conducted to increase interpretability. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The strength of the association between arginine supplements and ED was assessed using relative odds ratios and weighted mean differences with 95% CI. RESULTS: In total, 10 randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 540 patients with ED. The analysis demonstrated that arginine supplements with dosage ranging from 1,500 to 5,000 mg significantly improved ED compared with placebo or no treatment (odds ratios, 3.37 [1.29, 8.77], P = .01, I2 = 44). Arginine supplements also caused significant improvements in the IIEF subdomain scores of overall satisfaction, intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function, and erectile function, whereas the IIEF sexual desire score remain unchanged. The adverse effect rate in the arginine-treated group was 8.3%, and that in the placebo group was 2.3%, none of which were severe. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Arginine supplements can be recommended to patients with mild to moderate ED. STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: The strength of this study is that it is the first meta-analysis to assess the potential role of arginine supplements in ED compared with placebo or no treatment. A limitation is that the treatment dosage and duration varied among studies, which may have contributed to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The results of our systematic review and meta

07
META-ANALYSIS Nutrients (2018) PMID: 30577559 ↗
Association of l-Arginine Supplementation with Markers of Endothelial Function in Patients with Cardiovascular or Metabolic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2018 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrients (SMD 0.59). Key conclusion: Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

l-Arginine supplementation is a potential therapy for treating cardiovascular and metabolic diseases. However, the use of distinct l-arginine sources, intervened populations, and treatment regimens may have yielded confusion about their efficacy. This research constitutes a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the effects of l-arginine supplementation compared to placebo in individuals with cardiovascular disease (CVD), obesity, or diabetes. Eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials and interventions based on oral supplementation of l-arginine with a minimum duration of three days; comparison groups consisted of individuals with the same disease condition receiving an oral placebo substance. The primary outcome was flow-mediated dilation, and secondary outcomes were nitrite/nitrate (NOx) rate and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA). Statistical heterogeneity among studies included in the meta-analyses was assessed using the inconsistency index (I2). Fifty-four full-text articles from 3761 retrieved references were assessed for eligibility. After exclusions, 13 studies were included for data extraction. There was no difference in blood flow after post-ischemic hyperemia between the supplementation of l-arginine and placebo groups before and after the intervention period (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.30; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = -0.85 to 1.46; I2 = 96%). Sensitivity analysis showed decreased heterogeneity when the studies that most favor arginine and placebo were removed, and positive results in favor of arginine supplementation were found (SMD = 0.59; 95% CIs = 0.10 to 1.08; I2 = 75%). No difference was found in meta-analytical estimates of NOx and ADMA responses between arginine or placebo treatments. Overall, the results indicated that oral l-arginine supplementation was not associated with improvements on selected variables in these patients (PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017077289).

08
META-ANALYSIS Hypertension in pregnancy (2013) PMID: 22957482 ↗
Effect of L-arginine supplementation on blood pressure in pregnant women: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2013 Meta-Analysis published in Hypertension in pregnancy; statistical significance reported at p = 0.004. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: L-arginine supplementation had a significant effect of lowering diastolic blood pressure and prolonging gestation age in pregnancy.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the effect of L-arginine supplementation on blood pressure (BP) in pregnancy. METHODS: Trials were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. A total of five trials were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: L-arginine supplementation exhibited a mean decrease of 3.07 mmHg (p = 0.004) for diastolic blood pressure and a mean increase of 1.23 weeks (p = 0.002) for gestation age at delivery in pregnancy, but did not reduce systolic BP (p = 0.19) as compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: L-arginine supplementation had a significant effect of lowering diastolic blood pressure and prolonging gestation age in pregnancy.

09
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Nutrients (2026) PMID: 41754168 ↗
Effect of Perioperative Supplementation with Arginine and Omega-3 on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Pilot Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Nutrients involving n = 18 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.324. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, perioperative immunonutrition with arginine and omega-3 fatty acids did not improve postoperative clinical outcomes or inflammatory markers in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Perioperative immunonutrition, including arginine and omega-3 fatty acids, has been proposed to support postoperative recovery by modulating immune function. AIM: To evaluate the effects of perioperative arginine and omega-3 supplementation on postoperative infectious complications, mortality, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit duration, and inflammatory markers in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. METHODS: In this Pilot Open-Label randomized trial, 35 adult patients scheduled for elective gastrointestinal cancer surgery at Salah Azaiez Institute were randomly assigned to receive either perioperative immunonutrition (n = 18; three daily capsules of omega-3 and one sachet of Arginine+ for 7 days preoperatively and 7 days postoperatively) or standard care (n = 17). Primary endpoints were postoperative infectious complications and 1-month mortality. Secondary endpoints included hospital length of stay, ICU duration, and postoperative biochemical markers. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between groups in 1-month mortality (p = 0.324), hospital length of stay (median 7 vs. 7 days, p = 0.392), or ICU duration (median 5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.601). Urinary tract infection (5.9% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.939) and wound infection rates (5.9% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.581) were comparable. Importantly, postoperative C-reactive protein and other inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between groups (CRP: 165 vs. 175 mg/L; intergroup p = 0.798). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, perioperative immunonutrition with arginine and omega-3 fatty acids did not improve postoperative clinical outcomes or inflammatory markers in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery. At the administered dose and within a small, heterogeneous cohort, immunonutrition did not provide additional benefit beyond standard care. Larger, adequately powered multicenter trials with optimized dosing are required to clarify its role in gastrointestinal oncology.

10
RANDOMIZED TRIAL (RCT) Complementary therapies in medicine (2025) PMID: 40614877 ↗
L-ornithine supplementation in periodontitis treatment yields greater benefits than L-arginine after one year: Part II of a randomized controlled pilot study.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in Complementary therapies in medicine involving n = 75 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0001 (OR 1.12). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: After one year, L-ornithine supplementation demonstrated more pronounced clinical benefits than L-arginine, although both can modulate gingival CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: L-arginine and L-ornithine have previously shown limited short-term immunological benefits in the treatment of periodontitis. The aim of this study was to assess the extended efficacy and durability of the response to L-arginine or L-ornithine as adjuncts to periodontal therapy in adults with periodontitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 75 patients who previously received the course of L-arginine or L-ornithine as adjuncts to professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) during a preliminary randomized short-term part of a clinical trial (NCT05042024) were assessed clinically and immunologically (nested) after 12 months follow-up. The immunological assay included immunohistochemical identification of densities of CD68 + and CD163 + single-positive gingival macrophages. All patients did not receive new prescriptions or dietary changes and underwent personalized steps of periodontal treatment during observation. RESULTS: After one year, patients who received L-arginine or L-ornithine exhibited a significant reduction of sites with periodontal pocket depth of 4-5 mm compared to PMPR (p < 0.0001). L-ornithine was associated with BoP decreasing compared to PMPR and L-arginine (95 % CI of odds ratio [1.12-1.46], p = 0.0002; CI [0.72-0.94], p = 0.004), CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages density increasing compared to PMPR (p < 0.001) and L-arginine (p < 0.05). L-arginine resulted in increased density of CD68 + macrophages and elevated CD68 + /CD163 + ratio compared to the PMPR and L-ornithine; CI [0.41-0.63], p = 0.009, CI [1.45-2.72], p < 0.0001. CONCLUSION: After one year, L-ornithine supplementation demonstrated more pronounced clinical benefits than L-arginine, although both can modulate gingival CD68 + and CD163 + macrophages.

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category