NICEVIVA
DRUG INTERACTION RECORDED 1 Prescription Drug Interaction(s) Reported — Review the pharmacokinetic interaction matrix below before use.
Pharmacokinetic Alert
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Zinc (Testosterone)

MEN HEALTH · Evidence Monograph

Zinc (Testosterone) is an evidence-graded men health monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (5 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 6,237 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 5 Meta · 3 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 5 RCTs (4 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 6,237
Reported Trial Dosages 4,000 IU/day · 2,000 IU · 75 IU
Trial Duration Range 12 months · 15 months · 8 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (4,000 IU/day · 2,000 IU · 75 IU) over a structured 12 months evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Clinically Standardized Formulation
Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 12:30
With Breakfast or Lunch
Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
Primary men health clinical efficacy (30 PubMed studies)
Quantitative biomarker & outcome analysis (18 studies with effect-size/sample data)
Randomized controlled trial verification (5 RCTs · 4 double-blind)
Systematic review & meta-analysis synthesis (5 meta-analyses · 3 reviews)
01

What Is Zinc (Testosterone) & Why Does Form Matter?

Zinc (Testosterone) is classified under MEN HEALTH and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (4,000 IU/day, 2,000 IU, 75 IU).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Zinc (Testosterone) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (5 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Zinc (Testosterone) acts on pathways governing targeted physiological homeostasis, clinical biomarker modulation, and evidence-based nutritional support. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Zinc (Testosterone) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 5 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 5 randomized controlled trials (4 double-blind, n = 6,237 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:42033055 (2026) — "Physiological significance of autocrine orexinergic signaling in extra-hypothalamic tissues." (Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.) • PMID:42004696 (2026) — "Vitamin D supplementation in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effects on semen quality and endocrine function." (However, current evidence does not demonstrate improved clinical fertility outcomes, and higher doses (>4,000 IU/day) do not appear to confer additional benefits.) • PMID:41997366 (2026) — "Sex differences in the use of spatial strategies in humans: An updated systematic review of the last decade." (These findings emphasize the necessity of integrative models that consider developmental, neurobiological, and sociocultural contributors.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)SMD Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 419588830.76PMID 419452970.03-0.11Null (0)0.87Metric: SMD
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Clinically Standardized Formulation. Select third-party tested formulations that match the chemical form and daily dosage range used in published randomized controlled trials.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 4,000 IU/day · 2,000 IU · 75 IU · 100 mg over 12 months · 15 months · 8 weeks · 3 months. Optimal timing window: PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch (Taking supplements with a meal minimizes gastrointestinal irritation and supports consistent daily compliance.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Comfortable digestion and steady progress toward target clinical endpoints over 4–12 weeks.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue use and consult a healthcare professional if GI upset, rash, or unexpected symptoms arise.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

• [MODERATE] · /: Pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction reported in clinical literature (PMID:2192392). Consult your prescribing physician or pharmacist to separate dosing windows or monitor clinical labs.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 12:30 · With Breakfast or Lunch) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (4,000 IU/day · 2,000 IU · 75 IU) and re-evaluate efficacy after 12 months.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist before use if taking · /.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 18 Quantitative Analyses

01
CLINICAL STUDY Physiological reports (2026) PMID: 42033055 ↗
Physiological significance of autocrine orexinergic signaling in extra-hypothalamic tissues.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Physiological reports. Key conclusion: Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Orexin-A and orexin-B, originally discovered as hypothalamic neuropeptides, have been detected in extra-hypothalamic tissues together with their receptors (OX1R and OX2R) since the early 2000s. This systematic review is the first to comprehensively synthesize evidence on the autocrine/paracrine effects of locally produced orexin across extra-hypothalamic tissues. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Eligible studies were original, full-text, peer-reviewed articles reporting primary data on prepro-orexin/orexin peptide and/or OX1R/OX2R expression in non-neuronal extra-hypothalamic tissues, with evidence of co-expression within the same cell/tissue or functional effects reasonably attributable to locally produced orexin. From the 10 eligible studies, autocrine orexinergic signaling was functionally demonstrated in the adrenal gland (steroidogenesis via Gq/PLC/IP3/Ca2+), male reproductive tract (testosterone secretion), adipose tissue (lipolysis/thermogenesis), heart (myocardial protection via PI3K/Akt/eNOS), pancreas (glucose-regulated insulin/glucagon modulation), and liver (lipogenesis via ERK1/2). OX1R primarily activates the Gq/PLC/IP3/Ca2+ pathway, resulting in ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling (promoting secretion and proliferation), while OX2R couples to Gs/Gi, modulating cAMP and PI3K/Akt (favoring cytoprotection and anti-apoptosis). Autocrine orexinergic signaling constitutes a legitimate, compartment-autonomous regulatory mechanism in peripheral tissues, enabling rapid, tissue-specific responses insulated from central fluctuations. © 2026 The Author(s). Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society.

02
META-ANALYSIS PeerJ (2026) PMID: 42004696 ↗
Vitamin D supplementation in infertile men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effects on semen quality and endocrine function.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in PeerJ involving n = 1,168 participants. Key conclusion: However, current evidence does not demonstrate improved clinical fertility outcomes, and higher doses (>4,000 IU/day) do not appear to confer additional benefits.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of oral vitamin D supplementation on semen parameters, reproductive hormones and fertility outcomes in infertile men. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase for studies published within the last 10 years. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating oral vitamin D supplementation in infertile men and reporting semen parameters, reproductive hormones and/or fertility outcomes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 (RCTs) and ROBINS-I (observational studies). RESULTS: Eleven studies (eight RCTs and three observational studies; n = 1,168) were included. Vitamin D supplementation was associated with small but statistically significant improvements in semen volume, sperm concentration, progressive motility and serum testosterone. No significant effects were observed on clinical pregnancy or live birth. Reporting of adverse events was limited; no vitamin D-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation may improve selected semen parameters and testosterone levels in infertile men, particularly progressive sperm motility. However, current evidence does not demonstrate improved clinical fertility outcomes, and higher doses (>4,000 IU/day) do not appear to confer additional benefits. Larger, well-designed trials with standardized fertility endpoints are needed to confirm clinical efficacy. ©2026 Zhang et al.

03
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Behavioural brain research (2026) PMID: 41997366 ↗
Sex differences in the use of spatial strategies in humans: An updated systematic review of the last decade.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Behavioural brain research. Key conclusion: These findings emphasize the necessity of integrative models that consider developmental, neurobiological, and sociocultural contributors.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Although sex differences in spatial cognition have been widely studied, the extent to which men and women differ in their use of egocentric and allocentric spatial strategies remains unclear. This systematic review summarizes findings from 21 studies published between 2014 and 2024 that examined sex differences in spatial strategy use throughout development, adulthood, and aging. Studies were identified through searches of Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eligible articles examined egocentric and allocentric spatial strategies in humans and reported results by sex. Results demonstrated male advantages in allocentric strategy, as observed in thirteen studies involving children, young adults, and older adults. Men also outperformed women in several navigation outcomes, including target retrieval, route efficiency, and directional accuracy. Evidence for a female advantage in egocentric strategies was limited and inconsistent. Seven studies reported no sex differences, particularly those using small-scale, familiar, or less immersive tasks. This suggests that methodological factors and task demands strongly influence the observed effects. Age also influenced outcomes. Male advantages in allocentric strategies emerged in early childhood. Older women showed relatively preserved egocentric abilities, but greater decline in allocentric tasks. Men showed stronger hippocampal-parietal connectivity supporting allocentric processing, while women exhibited enhanced fronto-temporal connectivity. Hormonal studies highlight the context-dependent effects of testosterone and estrogen. These findings indicate that sex differences in spatial strategies are highly sensitive to task complexity, environmental familiarity, cognitive load, and individual factors. These findings emphasize the necessity of integrative models that consider developmental, neurobiological, and sociocultural contributors.

04
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in endocrinology (2026) PMID: 41958883 ↗
The impact of bariatric surgery on male sexual function: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in endocrinology involving n = 695 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD 0.76). Key conclusion: Body mass index (BMI) decreased markedly (MD = -13.86, p < 0.001).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Obesity has become a major global public health challenge, closely associated not only with metabolic and cardiovascular disorders but also with male sexual dysfunction. Emerging evidence suggests that bariatric surgery may improve sexual function in obese men by enhancing hormonal balance, reducing visceral adiposity, and restoring endothelial function. However, existing studies show strong heterogeneity in design, surgical approaches, and sample sizes, underscoring the need for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate and meta-analyze the effects of bariatric surgery on sexual function and related hormonal levels in obese men. METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant studies published up to June 2025. A random-effects model was applied to pool effect sizes, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic. Changes in International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) scores and hormone levels before and after surgery were evaluated. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias assessments were conducted, with all analyses performed using Stata 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 21 studies involving 695 participants were included. Pooled analyses showed significant improvements in both IIEF-5 and IIEF-15 total scores after surgery (MD = 6.45 and 9.03, respectively; p < 0.001), indicating overall enhancement in sexual function. Domain-specific results demonstrated significant improvements in erectile function, orgasmic function, sexual desire, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction, with erectile function showing the greatest improvement (SMD = 0.76); however, differences between domains were not statistically significant. Regarding hormonal outcomes, total testosterone increased significantly after surgery (MD = 8.21, p < 0.001), whereas free testosterone showed no significant change. Body mass index (BMI) decreased markedly (MD = -13.86, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses consistently supported the beneficial effects of surgery. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results, and Egger's test indicated no si

05
META-ANALYSIS Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) (2026) PMID: 41945297 ↗
Acute and Chronic Effects of Accentuated Eccentric Loading vs. Constant-Load Resistance Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) involving n = 773 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.48 (SMD 0.03). Key conclusion: Although considerable variance exists in certain outcomes, our estimated effects suggest that, compared to constant-load RT, AEL results in (1) similar acute responses in loads lifted during the concentric phase (standardized mean difference [SMD] = - 0.16; p = 0.48), mechanical
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Accentuated eccentric loading (AEL) is a resistance training (RT) method applying greater eccentric- than concentric-phase load to intensify the training stimulus; however, despite its common use, a comprehensive and quantitative review remains lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare acute responses and chronic adaptations between AEL and constant-load RT, and examine whether effects vary by AEL protocol (submaximal, maximal, supramaximal). METHODS: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and EBSCO were searched from inception through July 3, 2024; eligible English-language studies were included. Pooled and subgroup meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies involving 773 participants were included. Although considerable variance exists in certain outcomes, our estimated effects suggest that, compared to constant-load RT, AEL results in (1) similar acute responses in loads lifted during the concentric phase (standardized mean difference [SMD] = - 0.16; p = 0.48), mechanical performance at submaximal loads during the concentric phase (SMD = - 0.07; p = 0.37), countermovement jump height both immediately (SMD = - 0.06; p = 0.86) and delayed (SMD = - 0.23; p = 0.44) post-intervention, maximal voluntary isometric force immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.03; p = 0.89), blood lactate concentration during the intervention (SMD = - 0.06; p = 0.78), testosterone concentration immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.68; p = 0.15), creatine kinase concentration both immediately (SMD = 0.09; p = 0.72) and delayed (SMD = 0.14; p = 0.48) post-intervention, cortisol concentration immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.39; p = 0.05), heart rate during the intervention (SMD = 1.18; p = 0.07), acute muscle swelling immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.26; p = 0.42), muscle electrical activity during the concentric phase (SMD = - 0.01; p = 0.90), and muscle soreness both immediately (SMD = 0.28; p = 0.30) and delayed (SMD = 0.18; p = 0.28) post-intervention; (2) greater acute responses in blood lactate concentration immediately post-intervention (SMD = 0.44; p = 0.03), growth hormone concentration immediately post-intervention

06
META-ANALYSIS BMC endocrine disorders (2026) PMID: 41933328 ↗
Effects of androgen therapy on final adult height in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty: a meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in BMC endocrine disorders involving n = 803 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.0076 (MD 1.78). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Short-term androgen therapy can improve final adult height in boys with CDGP, with low-dose, short-course testosterone regimens appearing to be the most favorable option.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the effect of short-term androgen therapy on final adult height in boys with constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP). METHODS: Original studies investigating androgen therapy in children with CDGP and reporting final adult height as an outcome were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and SpringerLink. The search period extended from database inception to September 2025. EndNote 20.0 was used for duplicate removal, and study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were independently conducted by two researchers, with discrepancies resolved through consultation with a third researcher. Meta-analysis was performed using R 4.5.2 and Review Manager 5.4.1. RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible retrospective cohort studies involving 803 patients were included. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated good robustness of the pooled results, and Egger's tests indicated no significant publication bias (P1 = 0.0794, P2 = 0.3982). Meta-analysis showed that, compared with untreated controls, androgen therapy-including testosterone and oxandrolone-significantly increased measured final adult height [MD = 1.78 cm, 95% CI (0.47, 3.08), P = 0.0076] and significantly improved final height Z-scores [MD = 0.24, 95% CI (0.07, 0.41), P = 0.0057]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the low-dose regimen yielded the most favorable effect [MD = 1.88 cm, 95% CI (0.63, 3.12), P = 0.003], whereas the medium-dose [MD = 1.17 cm, 95% CI (-0.90, 3.25), P = 0.268] and high-dose regimens [MD = 1.68 cm, 95% CI (-5.07, 8.42), P = 0.626] showed no statistically significant benefit. Short-course therapy was associated with greater improvement in final adult height compared with long-course therapy [MD = 2.70 cm, 95% CI (1.30, 4.09), P < 0.001]. In addition, testosterone demonstrated superior efficacy compared with oxandrolone [MD = 2.64 cm, 95% CI (1.44, 3.80), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: Short-term androgen therapy can improve final adult height in boys with CDGP, with low-dose, short-course testosterone regimens appearing to be the most favorable option. Given the limited number

07
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW LGBT health (2026) PMID: 41925019 ↗
Maintaining Testosterone Therapy Throughout Ovarian Stimulation for Trans Masculine Individuals: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in LGBT health. Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Live births, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, are possible across a range of stimulation protocols under testosterone exposure.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence on continuous testosterone therapy during ovarian stimulation in trans masculine individuals. METHODS: A search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted through October 2024 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting ovarian stimulation on continuous testosterone therapy were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Case Reports was used to assess risk of bias, and descriptive statistics and qualitative synthesis were conducted. RESULTS: The review included six articles involving eight patients. Median age at oocyte cryopreservation was 27 years (range 20-34), and median age at initiation of testosterone was 24 (range 18-27). An antagonist protocol was used for seven patients. Letrozole was given to three patients during their cycle. Oocytes were cryopreserved for four patients, embryos were cryopreserved at the time of stimulation for two patients, and two patients created embryos from cryopreserved oocytes. The median number of oocytes retrieved from seven patients was 20 (range 13-56), and the median number of oocytes cryopreserved from six patients was 22.5 (range 9-30). To date, three embryo transfers (two frozen and one fresh) have been reported, all resulting in live births. CONCLUSION: Live births, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation, are possible across a range of stimulation protocols under testosterone exposure. As trans masculine patients report gender dysphoria with the fertility preservation process, these case reports present an opportunity for reconsideration of current practices and propose a paradigm shift in fertility care for transgender individuals.

08
META-ANALYSIS Frontiers in nutrition (2026) PMID: 41919084 ↗
Metabolic and bariatric surgery and male endocrine and reproductive health: a GRADE-assessed meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Frontiers in nutrition; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (MD 5.46). Key conclusion: These findings introduce bariatric surgery as an effective therapeutic strategy for weight loss management and male reproductive health improvement.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: The negative impact of obesity on male fertility and sexual health is well-established. Although metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) offers a powerful solution for severe obesity, its impact on the male androgens, semen quality, and sexual function are not yet fully understood. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic search of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for relevant studies published up to July 2024. Data about reproductive hormones, semen parameters, and sexual function in men with obesity undergoing bariatric surgery was extracted. For data synthesis, weighted mean differences (WMDs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies with 60 arms were included in our meta-analysis. Metabolic and bariatric surgery indicated elevated levels of total testosterone (TT) (WMD: 5.46 nmol/L, p < 0.001; WMD: 6.58 nmol/L, p < 0.001; and WMD: 8.02 nmol/L, p < 0.001), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) (WMD: 14.56 nmol/L, p < 0.001; WMD: 18.08 nmol/L, p < 0.001; and WMD: 23.64 nmol/L, p < 0.001), international index of erectile function (IIEF) (WMD: 9.36, p < 0.001), and diminished levels of PRL (WMD: -76.48 mIU/L, p = 0.003) at all intervals. Moreover, increased levels of free testosterone (FT) at 6-9 month (WMD: 66.61 nmol/L, p < 0.001), and >12 months (WMD: 78.94 nmol/L; p < 0.001) were observed pos-operative state among obese men. Also, decreased levels of estradiol (E2) at 6-9 month (WMD: -14.52 nmol/L, p = 0.005), and ≥12 months (WMD: -11.63 nmol/L; p < 0.001) was seen after bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: Overally, this meta-analysis illustrated that bariatric surgery improves the hormonal profile and sexual function in obese men profoundly. These findings introduce bariatric surgery as an effective therapeutic strategy for weight loss management and male reproductive health improvement.

09
CLINICAL STUDY Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia (2026) PMID: 41914227 ↗
Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell secretome promotes testicular regeneration following chemically induced injury: a review of preclinical studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: AdMSC secretome demonstrates therapeutic potential in chemically-induced testicular injury by promoting seminiferous tubule regeneration, reducing apoptosis, and enhancing Leydig cell recovery, with VEGF playing a critical mechanistic role.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Male infertility is a rising problem globally with male factors contributing up to 50% of all couple infertility cases. The sperm quality decline raises serious concerns regarding future population sustainability and male reproductive health. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell (AdMSC) secretome, defined as a cell-free product comprising paracrine factors secreted by these cells, has emerged as a promising cell-free regenerative therapy for testicular injury, offering advantages of accessibility and therapeutic potential. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of AdMSC secretome in chemically induced testicular injury models. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted across four electronic databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, OVID and Cochrane) covering publications from 2015 to 2025. Preclinical studies investigating the therapeutic effects of AdMSC secretome in murine models of chemically induced testicular injury were included. RESULTS: Three preclinical studies utilizing male murine models were analysed. Testicular injury was induced using busulfan, doxorubicin or acrylamide. AdMSC secretome was administered via intra-testicular injection (n=2) and intravenous injection (n=1). All studies demonstrated partial regeneration of seminiferous tubule in secretome-treated groups compared with controls. Two studies reported reduced cellular apoptosis using TUNEL assay and acridine orange staining. An increase in Leydig cell numbers was observed following secretome treatment, while Sertoli cells remained unchanged. One study identified vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) as a key paracrine mediator, with anti-VEGF intervention abolishing the therapeutic effect. Testosterone levels were consistently higher in secretome-treated groups compared to those receiving AdMSC transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: AdMSC secretome demonstrates therapeutic potential in chemically-induced testicular injury by promoting seminiferous tubule regeneration, reducing apoptosis, and enhancing Leydig cell recovery, with VEGF playing a critical mechanistic role. These findings support the potential AdMSC secretome as a cell-free regenerative appr

10
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Nutrients (2026) PMID: 41901143 ↗
The Association Between Vitamin D and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) in Women: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Nutrients involving n = 1,063 participants. Key conclusion: Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is common in women with PCOS and correlates with metabolic and reproductive dysfunction.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Background/Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder characterized by reproductive and metabolic dysfunction. Vitamin D deficiency is common in women with PCOS and is linked to adverse metabolic and reproductive outcomes. However, the role of vitamin D supplementation in managing PCOS remains unclear due to the heterogeneous evidence available. This systematic review aimed to synthesize both observational and interventional studies to assess the association between vitamin D levels and PCOS, focusing on prevalence, metabolic outcomes, and reproductive parameters. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase was conducted in October 2025, identifying studies published between January 2000 and October 2025. Eligible studies included observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and/or the effects of vitamin D supplementation in women with PCOS. Studies were included if they used recognized diagnostic criteria for PCOS or sufficient diagnostic details to confirm the condition. Two reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and quality assessment according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Results: Eleven studies (nine RCTs, two observational) encompassing 1063 women with PCOS met the inclusion criteria. Observational studies demonstrated inverse associations between serum 25(OH)D levels and insulin resistance, body mass index (BMI), and leptin, but not with total testosterone. RCTs showed modest and inconsistent improvements in insulin sensitivity, with effects more apparent in some trials enrolling vitamin D-deficient women. Reproductive benefits (cycle regularity/ovulation) were observed only in selected trials, generally with small samples and short follow-up. Conclusions: Vitamin D deficiency is common in women with PCOS and correlates with metabolic and reproductive dysfunction. While vitamin D supplementation shows variable effects, it should not be considered a stand-alone therapy for PCOS. Correction of deficiency may complement existing treatments, but evidence remains insufficient to support routine vitami

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category