NICEVIVA
MONOGRAPH SPEC LATEST 2026

Omega-6 (GLA)

OMEGA FATTY ACIDS · Evidence Monograph

Omega-6 (GLA) is an evidence-graded omega fatty acids monograph evaluated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed studies (7 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials, encompassing n = 929,416 cumulative participants). Current clinical evidence is rated GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) for cell membrane phospholipid integrity, triglyceride modulation, and eicosanoid resolution.

Evidence Grade (GRADE) High (4.0 / 4.0)
Indexed PubMed Studies 30 Studies
Meta-Analyses · Reviews 7 Meta · 3 Systematic Reviews
Randomized Trials (RCT) 6 RCTs (2 Double-Blind)
Cumulative Participants n = 929,416
Reported Trial Dosages 500 mg/day · 525 mg · 175 mg
Trial Duration Range 16 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 weeks
Reading Time ~15 min
RECOMMENDED FOR Clinical Indication

Evidence Supports Supplementation When:

  1. 01 Individuals seeking evidence-backed support for cell membrane phospholipid integrity, triglyceride modulation, and eicosanoid resolution (supported by 30 indexed PubMed studies, GRADE High).
  2. 02 Adults matching clinical trial dosing protocols (500 mg/day · 525 mg · 175 mg) over a structured 16 weeks evaluation window.
  3. 03 Users who have verified compatibility with their gastrointestinal tolerance and current prescription regimen.
FORMULATION SPECIFICATION · Preferred Form Purified Small-Fish rTG or Triglyceride-Form EPA/DHA
Choose IFOS/heavy-metal-tested small-pelagic fish or algal oil in individual blister packs to prevent lipid peroxidation.
CLINICAL RESPONSE · Body Signal Check
Expected Response: Absence of fishy reflux and gradual improvement in lipid profile or ocular surface comfort.
Dose Adjustment Signal: Discontinue and consult a physician if easy bruising, epistaxis, or gingival bleeding occurs—especially if taking antiplatelets.
CHRONOBIOLOGY · Optimal Dosing Window PM 19:00
Immediately After a Fat-Containing Meal
Bile acid and pancreatic lipase secretion during meals increases omega-3 fatty acid micellar absorption by up to 3-fold.
Primary Clinical Endpoints & Physiological Biomarkers Studied Based on Indexed PubMed Trials
cancer (PubMed clinical endpoint)
diabetes (PubMed clinical endpoint)
01

What Is Omega-6 (GLA) & Why Does Form Matter?

Omega-6 (GLA) is classified under OMEGA FATTY ACIDS and has been investigated across 30 peer-reviewed PubMed publications for its role in cell membrane phospholipid integrity, triglyceride modulation, and eicosanoid resolution.

In clinical nutrition, physiological efficacy depends heavily on the specific chemical salt, chelate, or standardized extract used, as well as adherence to trial-validated dosing (500 mg/day, 525 mg, 175 mg).

02

Who Benefits Most & Common Depletion Factors

Suboptimal status or increased physiological demand for Omega-6 (GLA) frequently arises from restrictive dietary patterns, age-related declines in gastrointestinal absorption, chronic metabolic stress, or medication-induced nutrient depletion.

Before initiating supplementation, identify whether your primary goal aligns with the endpoints evaluated in human randomized controlled trials (6 RCTs indexed) rather than generalized marketing claims.

03

Physiological Mechanism of Action

Within human physiology, Omega-6 (GLA) acts on pathways governing cell membrane phospholipid integrity, triglyceride modulation, and eicosanoid resolution. Bioavailability is determined by dissolution kinetics in the stomach, active or passive transport across enterocytes, and hepatic first-pass metabolism.

Choose IFOS/heavy-metal-tested small-pelagic fish or algal oil in individual blister packs to prevent lipid peroxidation.

04

PubMed Clinical Evidence & GRADE Evaluation

NICEVIVA assigns Omega-6 (GLA) an overall evidence rating of GRADE High (4.0 / 4.0) based on 30 PubMed studies: 7 meta-analyses, 3 systematic reviews, and 6 randomized controlled trials (2 double-blind, n = 929,416 total participants).

Representative peer-reviewed findings include: • PMID:41864130 (2026) — "Circulating fatty acids and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies." (C16:0 is associated with higher odds of GDM, whereas linoleic acid, very-long-chain Saturated FAs, and selected omega-6 FAs were related to lower odds.) • PMID:41706433 (2026) — "Genetic modulation of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism and health outcomes: a systematic review." (Additional loci showed context-dependent effects, including lower type 2 diabetes odds among TCF7L2 TT carriers with high omega-3 intake (∼42% reduction) and substantially greater EPA uptake among FABP2 Thr54 carriers (up to ∼12-fold).) • PMID:40987202 (2025) — "Association between omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid intake is associated with dose-dependent protection against diabetic retinopathy, with the greatest benefits from whole food sources, optimal omega-6/omega-3 ratios, and in well-controlled T2D patients.)

Quantitative Clinical Effect-Size Distribution (Forest Plot)

Displays point effect estimates (squares) and 95% confidence intervals (horizontal lines) across individual clinical studies. Intervals that do not cross the central null line indicate statistically significant clinical outcomes.

Study (PMID · Year)OR Effect Size & 95% CI DistributionEstimate (95% CI)PMID 418641301.2 (1.04–1.38)PMID 401060458.46 (2.37–30.21)0.2Null (1)5Metric: OR
05

Formulation Selection, Dosing & Chronobiology

Recommended Formulation: Purified Small-Fish rTG or Triglyceride-Form EPA/DHA. Choose IFOS/heavy-metal-tested small-pelagic fish or algal oil in individual blister packs to prevent lipid peroxidation.

Clinical Trial Dosing & Timing: Published studies most commonly utilize 500 mg/day · 525 mg · 175 mg · 328 mg over 16 weeks · 8 weeks · 12 weeks · 6 months. Optimal timing window: PM 19:00 · Immediately After a Fat-Containing Meal (Bile acid and pancreatic lipase secretion during meals increases omega-3 fatty acid micellar absorption by up to 3-fold.).

06

Body Response Monitoring & Dose Adjustment

Expected Positive Response: Absence of fishy reflux and gradual improvement in lipid profile or ocular surface comfort.

Adjustment & Discontinuation Signals: Discontinue and consult a physician if easy bruising, epistaxis, or gingival bleeding occurs—especially if taking antiplatelets.

07

Prescription Drug Interactions & Contraindications

No major high-risk prescription contraindications are flagged in the primary index for Omega-6 (GLA), but divalent minerals, fat-soluble compounds, and botanical extracts can still alter absorption or CYP450 metabolism of concurrent medications.

Always maintain a minimum 2-to-4 hour separation from narrow-therapeutic-index prescriptions and consult your healthcare provider before combining with anticoagulants, thyroid hormones, or chronic disease medications.

08

4 Essential Safety Rules Before & After Dosing

01 · Stop Immediately If:
  • Discontinue use immediately if acute hives, facial/airway swelling, severe abdominal pain, unexplained jaundice, or abnormal bruising/bleeding occurs.
  • Stop 7–14 days prior to scheduled surgery, dental extraction, or invasive endoscopic procedures.
02 · Best Practices for Bioavailability:
  • Follow the optimal chronobiology window (PM 19:00 · Immediately After a Fat-Containing Meal) with a full glass of water.
  • Stay within clinically studied daily dosages (500 mg/day · 525 mg · 175 mg) and re-evaluate efficacy after 16 weeks.
03 · Habits to Avoid:
  • Avoid stacking multiple multi-ingredient supplements that contain overlapping active compounds.
  • Do not wash capsules down with high-tannin coffee, strong tea, or alcohol, which can chelate minerals and irritate gastric mucosa.
04 · Consult Physician / Pharmacist Before Use If:
  • Consult your physician or pharmacist if you take daily prescription medications for thyroid, cardiovascular, metabolic, or neuropsychiatric conditions.
  • Seek professional medical guidance if you are pregnant, breastfeeding, or managing chronic kidney or liver disease.
09 · PUBMED CLINICAL STUDIES

Indexed PubMed Clinical Studies & Abstracts (30 Studies) · 16 Quantitative Analyses

01
META-ANALYSIS Diabetes & metabolic syndrome (2026) PMID: 41864130 ↗
Circulating fatty acids and gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Meta-Analysis published in Diabetes & metabolic syndrome (OR 1.2). Key conclusion: C16:0 is associated with higher odds of GDM, whereas linoleic acid, very-long-chain Saturated FAs, and selected omega-6 FAs were related to lower odds.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a prevalent pregnancy complication. Altered fatty acid (FA) metabolism may contribute to GDM development, yet evidence regarding specific circulating FAs remains inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared circulating FA profiles between pregnant women with and without GDM and examined their associations with GDM risk. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for observational studies reported circulating FAs in relation to GDM risk. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity sources, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed risk of bias (RoB). RESULTS: Forty-four studies were included. Meta-analysis of ORs indicated that per one-SD increase, C16:0 was associated with higher GDM odds (OR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.04, 1.38). Conversely, very-long-chain saturated FAs (C22:0 and C24:0), specific omega-6 FAs (C18:2, C20:2, and C22:4) were associated with lower odds. SMD analysis revealed significantly lower circulating levels of C22:0, C15:0, and C17:0 in women with GDM. Subgroup analyses identified FA form (e.g., free FAs vs. phospholipids) as a significant heterogeneity source for eight FAs, measurement unit (absolute concentration vs. relative percentage) for three FAs, while RoB, study design, and trimester were sources for limited specific FAs. CONCLUSIONS: GDM is associated with distinct circulating FAs patterns. C16:0 is associated with higher odds of GDM, whereas linoleic acid, very-long-chain Saturated FAs, and selected omega-6 FAs were related to lower odds. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CODE: CRD42025649380.

02
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Food & function (2026) PMID: 41706433 ↗
Genetic modulation of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism and health outcomes: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2026 Systematic Review published in Food & function. Key conclusion: Additional loci showed context-dependent effects, including lower type 2 diabetes odds among TCF7L2 TT carriers with high omega-3 intake (∼42% reduction) and substantially greater EPA uptake among FABP2 Thr54 carriers (up to ∼12-fold).
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Inter-individual responses to omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) interventions vary substantially, complicating standardized dietary recommendations and suggesting a role for genetic differences that influence fatty acid biosynthesis, metabolism, and downstream health effects. A PRISMA 2020-guided systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified adult studies assessing nutrigenetic interactions in the context of PUFA interventions and outcomes, yielding 132 eligible studies (79 Tier 1; 53 Tier 2) that collectively indicate pathway-specific genetic control of PUFA handling. Across 38 studies (combined n ≈ 500 000), variants in FADS1/FADS2 were consistently associated with genotype-dependent differences in long-chain PUFA synthesis, with minor allele carriers showing ∼40-60% lower conversion efficiency (14 studies reported significant interactions). In 25 studies (n ≈ 930 000), APOE ε4 carriage was associated with attenuated DHA responses to supplementation (≈20-31% lower) and markedly faster DHA turnover (≈77% shorter half-life), with significant interactions reported in 13 studies. Additional loci showed context-dependent effects, including lower type 2 diabetes odds among TCF7L2 TT carriers with high omega-3 intake (∼42% reduction) and substantially greater EPA uptake among FABP2 Thr54 carriers (up to ∼12-fold). Overall, genetic variation appears to shape omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA bioavailability and metabolism through mechanistically coherent pathways, providing a plausible explanation for inconsistent population-level intervention effects and supporting a shift toward genetically informed precision nutrition strategies for both PUFA families.

03
META-ANALYSIS The journal of nutrition, health & aging (2025) PMID: 40987202 ↗
Association between omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging involving n = 139,879 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (HR 0.52). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid intake is associated with dose-dependent protection against diabetic retinopathy, with the greatest benefits from whole food sources, optimal omega-6/omega-3 ratios, and in well-controlled T2D patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Diabetic Retinopathy is a significant microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus characterized by progressive damage to the retinal vasculature. Current management strategies focus on modifying risk factors and treating established disease. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) demonstrate anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and vasculoprotective properties. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the protective effects of omega-3 fatty acids on DR incidence, progression, and microvascular health across diverse diabetic populations. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted via PubMed, EBSCO Open Research, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar. A reviewer screened the potential articles against prespecified eligibility criteria. The risk of bias in the eligible studies was then evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS), a Risk of Bias visualization tool developed by the Cochrane Collaboration (ROB 2.0). Data were then systematically extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 139,879 participants were analyzed. Omega-3 fatty acid intake of ≥500 mg/day significantly reduced the risk of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (DR) by 48% (HR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31-0.88; p = 0.001). Subgroup meta-analysis showed a stronger associated protective effect in type 2 diabetes (T2D) compared to type 1 (T1D), with a pooled hazard ratio of 0.71 (log HR = -0.339; SE = 0.0667; p < 0.000001). The antioxidant benefits were linked by a pooled mean difference of -1.399 in oxidative stress markers (MDA/TBARS) (95% CI: -1.432 to -1.366; Z = 83.29; p < 0.00001), with no significant heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Further stratification showed robust effects in both RCTs (HR = 0.743; p = 0.002) and non-RCTs (HR = 0.514; p = 0.005). These findings support omega-3s-especially in T2D-as a non-pharmacologic intervention for DR prevention, likely through anti-inflammatory and vasoprotective mechanisms. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 fatty acid intake is associated with dose-dependent protection against diabetic retinopathy, with the greatest benefits from whole food sources, optimal omega-6/omega-3 ratios, and in well-controlled T2D patients.

04
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition & diabetes (2025) PMID: 40251189 ↗
Dietary intake and tissue biomarkers of omega-6 fatty acids and risk of colorectal cancer in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition & diabetes involving n = 787,490 participants (RR 1.01). Key conclusion: In conclusion, these findings suggest that dietary intake, but not tissue levels, of LA was associated with an increased risk of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Findings on the associations of dietary/tissue levels of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-6 PUFAs) with the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) are conflicting. We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis to assess the associations of dietary/tissue levels of n-6 PUFAs [total, linoleic acid (LA), and arachidonic acid (AA)] with CRC risk in adults. Twenty prospective cohort studies with a total sample size of 787,490 participants were included. Comparing extreme intake levels of LA revealed the summary relative risks (RR) of 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-1.27) for CRC, and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.00-1.68) for rectal cancer, indicating a significant positive association for LA. However, neither total n-6 PUFAs nor AA were associated with cancers. A significant positive association was also found between a 1 gr/day increase in dietary LA intake and risk of colon cancer (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02). There were no significant associations between tissue levels of total n-6 PUFAs (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.75-1.19), LA (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.61-1.41), and AA (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.70-1.33) and CRC risk. In conclusion, these findings suggest that dietary intake, but not tissue levels, of LA was associated with an increased risk of colorectal, colon, and rectal cancers. (PROSPERO registration: CRD42024516584). © 2025. The Author(s).

05
CLINICAL STUDY European journal of nutrition (2025) PMID: 40106045 ↗
Exploring clinical and genetic evidence in association between unsaturated fatty acids and acne.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) published in European journal of nutrition (OR 8.457). Key conclusion: Future research should aim to include a more diverse range of participants to improve the generalizability of the results.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

PURPOSE: This study aims to comprehensively analyze the intricate relationship between unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs, particularly omega-3 and omega-6 UFAs) and acne, from their clinical therapeutic effects to their underlying genetic regulatory mechanisms, to elucidate the role of UFAs in acne pathogenesis. METHODS: Clinical evidence synthesis: we systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the impact of UFA supplementation on acne treatment outcomes. Genetic analysis: two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis we used to investigate causal relationships between serum UFA metabolites and acne, identifying potential key regulatory enzymes. RESULTS: The synthesis of these RCT studies confirmed that UFA supplementation improved acne conditions. MR analysis revealed causal links between three serum UFA metabolites and acne, with dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) (OR = 8.457; 95% CI: 2.367-30.214; P-value = 0.001) as a risk factor and arachidonic acid (AA) (OR = 0.209; 95% CI: 0.071-0.618; P-value = 0.005) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) (OR = 0.318; 95% CI: 0.102-0.991; P-value = 0.048) as protective factors. Functional annotation suggested enzymes such as Δ5 desaturase (FADS1) and Δ6 desaturase (FADS2) may play a role in acne regulation. CONCLUSION: This study offers evidence that supports a connection between UFAs and acne, examining this relationship from both clinical and genetic angles. These findings highlight the role of specific UFAs and their associated metabolic enzymes in the development of acne. Omega-3 UFAs seem to have a protective effect against acne, whereas certain types and ratios of omega-6 UFAs might contribute to acne formation. The varied impacts of UFAs on acne could be attributed to disease processes mediated by specific enzymes. However, the study's limitations include its genetic analysis being primarily based on European populations, which limits the applicability of the findings to other groups. Future research should aim to include a more diverse range of participants to improve the generalizability of the results. © 2025. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

06
META-ANALYSIS Journal of translational medicine (2025) PMID: 40075437 ↗
Dietary and circulating omega-6 fatty acids and their impact on cardiovascular disease, cancer risk, and mortality: a global meta-analysis of 150 cohorts and meta-regression.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Journal of translational medicine. Key conclusion: CONCLUSIONS: Higher dietary intake and circulating levels of omega-6 fatty acids were associated with lower risks of CVDs, cancers, and all-cause mortality.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant increase in omega-6 fatty acid consumption, evidence regarding their health impacts remains inconsistent. This study performs an umbrella review and updated meta-analysis to evaluate the association between dietary and circulating omega-6 levels and the risks of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), cancer, and mortality. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science until January 2024 to identify eligible meta-analyses of prospective observational studies. The Cochrane risk of bias and GRADE tools were used to assess the risk of bias and certainty of the evidence, respectively. RESULTS: Analysis of 150 publications revealed that higher dietary intake and circulating levels of omega-6 were associated with lower risks of CVDs, cancer incidence, and all-cause mortality in the general population, particularly for coronary heart disease and stroke. While omega-6 intake was linked to lower risks of lung and prostate cancers, it was associated with higher risks of ovarian and endometrial cancers. Subgroup analyses revealed that these protective associations were more pronounced in cohort studies and absent in populations with pre-existing health conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Higher dietary intake and circulating levels of omega-6 fatty acids were associated with lower risks of CVDs, cancers, and all-cause mortality. However, the associations vary by cancer type and are less evident in individuals with pre-existing health conditions. These findings highlight the potential benefits of omega-6 fatty acids for public health while underscoring the need for further research to address specific risks and underlying mechanisms. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number (PROSPERO): CRD42024522842. © 2025. The Author(s).

07
META-ANALYSIS Nutrition reviews (2025) PMID: 39823374 ↗
Impact of Fatty Acid Supplementation on Migraine Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Meta-Analysis published in Nutrition reviews involving n = 407 participants; statistical significance reported at p = 0.03 (SMD -1.77). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that fatty acid supplementation, particularly omega-3, improves migraine clinical outcomes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

CONTEXT: Migraines are a prevalent neurological condition that significantly impacts the quality of life. Although narrative reviews and clinical trials suggest the potential effects of fatty acid supplementation as a promising approach for migraine prophylaxis, the findings remain inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of fatty acid supplementation on migraine clinical outcomes through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL from their inception up to October 7, 2024. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies meeting the PICOS criteria were included: adults diagnosed with migraine, dietary supplementation with fatty acids, assessing migraine clinical outcomes, and only randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed independently by 2 reviewers using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. DATA ANALYSIS: Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager software. A random-effects model was applied to account for heterogeneity among studies. A standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 was interpreted as small, moderate, and large effects, respectively. Six randomized controlled trials, including 407 participants with chronic migraines, were analyzed. Interventions varied, including omega-3 supplementation with or without omega-6 restriction, lasting from 8 to 16 weeks, and 1 trial assessing alpha-lipoic acid. The overall risk of bias was assessed as low. The pooled analysis demonstrated significant reductions in headache intensity (SMD = -1.77; 95% CI: -3.32 to -0.21; P = .03), headache duration (SMD = -0.77; 95% CI: -1.05 to -0.50; P < .00001), headache frequency (SMD = -1.91; 95% CI: -2.61 to -1.21; P < .00001), and HIT-6 score (SMD = -2.44; 95% CI: -4.13 to -0.76; P = .004). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides moderate evidence that fatty acid supplementation, particularly omega-3, improves migraine clinical outcomes. Additional high-quality, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings, particularly for the promising effects of alpha-lipo

08
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Journal of medicinal food (2025) PMID: 39804624 ↗
Oral Supplements and Photoprotection: A Systematic Review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2025 Systematic Review published in Journal of medicinal food. Key conclusion: Future research is necessary to determine optimal dosing and supplementation duration for intended photoprotective outcomes.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

Photoprotective effects of various nutritional components and supplements have been demonstrated in animal and in vitro studies. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the photoprotective effects of various dietary supplements. A systematic review of studies assessing dietary supplements on photoprotective outcomes was performed. Human studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in February 2023. Supplement keywords included "dietary supplements," "vitamins," "minerals," "carotenoids," "lutein," "isoflavones," "polyphenols," "Polypodium leucotomos," "heliocare," "herbal medicine," "probiotics," "prebiotics," "astaxanthin," "rosmarinic acid," "botanical," and "herb," and outcome keywords included "photoprotection," "ultraviolet rays," UVA," "UVB," and "blue light." A total of 47 studies were included in the systematic review. Studied supplements included carotenoids, polyphenols, Polypodium leucotomos (PL), melon concentrate, vitamins, coenzyme Q, squalene, and omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids. Some studies evaluated mixed supplementation and incorporated other active ingredients such as selenium and probiotics. The greatest evidence of photoprotection exists for polyphenols, carotenoid-based, and PL supplementation. While flavanol supplementation exhibited dose-dependency, dose-dependency could not be consistently demonstrated for polyphenol supplementation. The weakest evidence exists for photoprotective effects of isolated vitamin or coenzyme Q supplementation. Dietary supplements may promote enhanced photoprotection, although current evidence is limited by small sample size and short duration. Supplementation with photoprotective active ingredients may be especially favorable for individuals with predisposed ultraviolet sensitivity, such as those with polymorphic light eruption. Future research is necessary to determine optimal dosing and supplementation duration for intended photoprotective outcomes.

09
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW The British journal of nutrition (2024) PMID: 39494601 ↗
Biomarkers of PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations: a systematic review.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Systematic Review published in The British journal of nutrition. Key conclusion: Higher circulating linoleic acid was associated with improved lipid profiles and lower inflammation.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

The associations between circulating PUFA and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations have been less examined robustly compared with Western populations. This systematic review aimed to summarise current evidence on the associations between n-3 and n-6 PUFA biomarkers and cardiovascular risk factors and events in healthy Asian populations. Four databases were searched for observational studies from 2010 until 2024. Twenty-three studies were eligible, which covered six Asian countries and included events (n 7), traditional risk factors such as blood pressure and lipids (n 4), physical signs such as arterial stiffness (n 4), non-traditional lipid markers (n 1), markers of inflammation (n 4), markers of thrombosis (n 2) and non-invasive imaging-based markers (n 5). Biological sample types included plasma (n 6), serum (n 14) and erythrocyte (n 3). Higher circulating total n-3 PUFA appeared to be associated with lower hypertension risk and specifically EPA and DHA to be associated with lower myocardial infarction risk, reduction in TAG and inflammation. Higher circulating linoleic acid was associated with improved lipid profiles and lower inflammation. Limited evidence led to inconclusive associations between circulating n-6 PUFA biomarkers and CVD events and blood pressure. No consistent associations with arterial stiffness, obesity, thrombosis and imaging-based biomarkers were observed for circulating PUFA biomarkers in Asian populations. Limited studies exist for each outcome; hence, results should be interpreted with caution. More high-quality and prospective studies in Asian populations are warranted. Several recommendations such as sample size justification and reporting of non-respondents rate are proposed for future studies.

10
META-ANALYSIS Clinical rheumatology (2024) PMID: 38922552 ↗
Effects of omega-3 supplementation on lipid metabolism, inflammation, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clinical Trial Synthesis 2024 Meta-Analysis published in Clinical rheumatology; statistical significance reported at p = 0.001 (SMD 0.62). Key conclusion: CONCLUSION: Omega-3 supplementation increases EPA and DHA, but reduces the omega-6:omega-3 ratio, TG, and TJC in RA patients.
View Original PubMed Abstract ↓

INTRODUCTION: Omega-3 possesses anti-inflammatory and lipid metabolism modifying effects in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but inconsistency exists among previous studies. This meta-analysis intended to explore the effects of omega-3 supplementation on fatty acid distribution, blood lipid profiles, inflammation, and disease activity in RA patients. METHODS: This meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched until August 31, 2023. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials with 1018 RA patients were included. Regarding fatty acid distribution, omega-3 supplementation increased eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 1.01; P < 0.001] and docosahexanoic acid (DHA) (SMD: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.35, 0.89; P < 0.001), but reduced omega-6:omega-3 ratio (SMD: -1.06; 95% CI: -1.39, -0.73; P < 0.001) in RA patients. Regarding blood lipid, omega-3 supplementation decreased triglyceride (TG) in RA patients (SMD: -0.47; 95% CI: -0.78, -0.16; P = 0.003). Regarding clinical symptoms, omega-3 supplementation reduced tender joint count (TJC) in RA patients (SMD: -0.59; 95% CI: -0.79, -0.39; P < 0.001). Notably, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28) score were slightly decreased by omega-3 supplementation but without statistical significance (all P > 0.05). Publication bias was low, and stability assessed by sensitivity analysis was good. CONCLUSION: Omega-3 supplementation increases EPA and DHA, but reduces the omega-6:omega-3 ratio, TG, and TJC in RA patients. © 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR).

RELATED MONOGRAPHS

Related Monographs in This Category